State v. Wiggins

Decision Date11 October 2007
Docket NumberNo. 446P07.,446P07.
Citation653 S.E.2d 160
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court
PartiesSTATE of North Carolina v. Kenneth James WIGGINS and Robert Alphonso Cartwright.
ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 11th day of September 2007 by Defendant (Cartwright) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of October 2007."

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • State v. Robledo
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • 4 Noviembre 2008
    ...Direct evidence is not required; awareness or knowledge may be inferred from incriminating circumstances. State v. Wiggins, 185 N.C.App. 376, 387-88, 648 S.E.2d 865, 873-74, disc. review denied, 361 N.C. 703, 653 S.E.2d 160 (2007); see also N.C.P.I. — Criminal 104.41 ("A person's awareness ......
  • State v. Torres-Gonzalez
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • 7 Mayo 2013
    ...knowingly possessed a given controlled substance; and (2) that the amount possessed was greater than 28 grams.” State v. Wiggins, 185 N.C.App. 376, 386, 648 S.E.2d 865, 872 (citation omitted), disc. review denied,361 N.C. 703, 653 S.E.2d 160 (2007). The element of knowing possession may be ......
  • State v. Oliver, No. COA07-972 (N.C. App. 8/19/2008)
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • 19 Agosto 2008
    ...knowingly possessed a given controlled substance; and (2) that the amount possessed was greater than 28 grams." State v. Wiggins, ___ N.C. App. ___, ___, 648 S.E.2d 865, 872, disc. review denied, 361 N.C. 703, 653 S.E.2d 160 (2007). Similarly, to prove defendant possessed marijuana with the......
  • State v. Steele
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • 3 Julio 2018
    ...officers in the investigative process are admissible as nonhearsay and "not barred by the Confrontation Clause." State v. Wiggins , 185 N.C. App. 376, 384, 648 S.E.2d 865, 871 (citing Crawford , 541 U.S. at 59 n.9, 124 S.Ct. at 1369 n.9, 158 L.Ed. 2d at 198 n.9 ), disc. review denied , 361 ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT