State v. Wimberly
Decision Date | 15 October 1946 |
Parties | STATE ex rel. HAMMOND et al. v. WIMBERLY et al. |
Court | Tennessee Supreme Court |
Appeal from Chancery Court, Knox County; Thomas H. Goodman (sitting by interchange for Judge A. E. Mitchell), Judge.
Suit by the State, on the relation of W. C. Hammond and others, against Harold Wimberly and others, to enjoin the holding of a recall election in the City of Knoxville, wherein defendants filed a demurrer. From a decree sustaining the demurrer, the complainants appeal.
Affirmed.
Ely & Ely, of Knoxville, for complainants.
J. W. Baker, Taylor H. Cox and R. R. Kramer, all of Knoxville, for defendants.
The chancellor sustained the demurrer of the defendants to the injunction bill filed herein and the appeal to this Court resulted.
The object of the bill is to prevent, by injunctive processes, the holding of a recall election in the City of Knoxville to determine whether or not the complainant, Cas Walker, shall be removed from the office of Mayor and also certain councilmen of the city.
The petitions seeking a recall election were duly filed with the Commissioners of Elections of Knox County. Each petition bore a large number of signatures, purportedly of persons who represented themselves to be qualified voters of the City of Knoxville.
On May 6, 1946, complainant Hammond filed this bill in the chancery court stating that the defendants Commissioners of Elections were about to certify as sufficient the recall petitions heretofore referred to (1) without removing therefrom allegedly forged signatures; (2) without removing therefrom pages which allegedly bore defective affidavits; (3) without removing therefrom signatures allegedly obtained through misrepresentation; (4) without removing therefrom the names of all persons who either at the time of signing the petitions, or at the time the petitions were filed, had not been registered for a period of twenty days, and had not held a poll tax receipt for a period of sixty days; (5) without removing therefrom the names of signers who, prior to the time the Commissioners acted upon the petitions, had made written request for the withdrawal of their names; and (6) without publishing in full the petitions in some local newspaper.
The bill charged that the Commissioners had acted arbitrarily in performing the task just mentioned, and the bill prayed for an injunction and an alternative writ of mandamus. Thereupon the defendants filed their demurrer.
This lawsuit involves the proper construction of section 98 of the charter of the City of Knoxville, Private Acts 1923, Chapter 412, which reads as follows:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
American Civil Liberties Union v. Darnell
...944 (1948) (holding that voters lacked standing to bring suit to enjoin elections in two county district); State ex rel. Hammond v. Wimberly, 184 Tenn. 132, 196 S.W.2d 561 (1946) (holding that voters lacked standing to sue to enjoin local officials from certifying a recall petition and hold......
-
Elder v. Anderson
...is enjoined, and there is but one way in which it can be performed lawfully, then there is no discretion.' In State ex rel. Hammond v. Wimberly, 184 Tenn. 132, 196 S.W.2d 561, 563, the court '* * * where the law prescribes and defines the duties to be performed with such precision and certa......
-
Schecter v. Los Angeles County
...is enjoined, and there is but one way in which it can be performed lawfully, then there is no discretion.''In State ex rel. Hammond v. Wimberly, 184 Tenn. 132, 196 S.W.2d 561, 563, the court stated: '* * * where the law prescribes and defines the duties to be performed with such precision a......