State v. Winkelmeier

Decision Date31 March 1864
Citation35 Mo. 103
PartiesTHE STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent, v. JULIUS WINKELMEIER, Appellant.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from St. Louis Criminal Court.

Voullaire, for respondent.

Woerner, for appellant.

BATES, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court.

The defendant was indicted for selling liquor on Sunday.The evidence was that he sold beer, but did not sell distilled liquors.He was found guilty and fined, and appealed to this court.He claims a right to keep open his beer-house and sell beer on Sunday, under a supposed permission by the corporate authorities of the city of St. Louis.The General Assembly, by an act approved March 4, 1857, enacted “that the corporate authorities of the different cities in the county of St. Louis shall have the power, whenever a majority of the legal voters of the respective cities in said county authorize them so to do, to grant permission for the opening of any establishment, or establishments, within the corporate limits of said cities, for the sale of refreshments of any kind (distilled liquors excepted), on any day in the week.

This act does not directly repeal the act making it criminal to sell fermented liquor on Sunday; and the power of the city of St. Louis to grant permission for the opening of any establishment for the sale of beer on Sunday, very clearly depends upon a previous authorization by a majority of the legal voters of the city.The act expressly requires a majority of the legal voters; that is, of all the legal voters of the city, and not merely of all those who might at a particular time choose to vote upon the question.The defendant did not give in evidence any permission specially to himself, but gave in evidence an...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
56 cases
  • In re Denny
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • February 1, 1901
    ...59 Minn. 351, 61 N. W. 322;Smith v. Board, 64 Minn. 16, 65 N. W. 950;State v. Powell (Miss.) 27 South. 927, 48 L. R. A. 652;State v. Winkelmeier, 35 Mo. 103;State v. Sutterfield, 54 Mo. 391;State v. Mayor of City of St. Louis, 73 Mo. 435;State v. Francis, 95 Mo. 44, 8 S. W. 1;State v. McGow......
  • Brenner v. School District of Kansas City, Missouri
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Missouri
    • August 14, 1970
    ...rel. Litson v. McGowan, (1897) 138 Mo. 187, 39 S.W. 771, involving the adoption of a township form of county government; and State v. Winkelmeier, 35 Mo. 103 (1864), involving the sale of beer on Sunday, for examples of extraordinary majority requirements which Missouri selected for the det......
  • Green v. State Board of Canvassers
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • December 24, 1896
  • State ex rel. Maggard v. Pond
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • December 19, 1887
    ...supra; Township Organization Law, 55 Mo. 295; State ex rel. v. Mayor St. Joseph, 37 Mo. 270; State v. Binder, 38 Mo. 450; State v. Winkelmeier, 35 Mo. 103. (4) principle, it makes no difference whether the majority is expressed by ballot at an election, or in the form of a petition or certi......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT