State v. Wright, 589
| Decision Date | 02 December 1964 |
| Docket Number | No. 589,589 |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
| Parties | STATE, v. Odis Henry WRIGHT. |
Atty. Gen. T. W. Bruton, Asst. Atty. Gen. Richard T. Sanders, for the State.
Holland & Faircloth, Roseboro, Nance, Barrington, Collier & Singleton, Fayetteville, for defendant.
The State's evidence was sufficient to carry the case to the jury and to support the verdict rendered. No error sufficiently prejudicial to justify a new trial has been shown.
We deem it inappropriate to include herein a recital of the sordid evidence reveraled by the record.
The verdict and judgment are upheld on authority of State v. Spivey, 213 N.C. 45, 195 S.E. 1.
No error.
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
State v. Stokes, 248
...State v. Stubbs, 266 N.C. 295, 145 S.E.2d 899; State v. Harwood, 264 N.C. 746, 142 S.E.2d 691; State v. O'Keefe, supra; State v. Wright, 263 N.C. 129, 139 S.E.2d 10; State v. King, 256 N.C. 236, 123 S.E.2d 486; State v. Whittemore, 255 N.C. 583, 122 S.E.2d 396; State v. Williams, 247 N.C. 2......
-
State v. Harward, 826
...now G.S. § 14-202.1. That Act supplements G.S. § 14-177. State v. Lance, 244 N.C. 455, 94 S.E.2d 335.' Thereafter, in State v. Wright, 263 N.C. 129, 139 S.E.2d 10, a case involving a charge of the crime against nature with a thirteen-year-old boy, this Court upheld a judgment based on a ver......
- State v. Farrington