State v. Young, 93-0387-CR
| Decision Date | 10 November 1994 |
| Docket Number | No. 93-0387-CR,93-0387-CR |
| Citation | 191 Wis.2d 393,528 N.W.2d 417 |
| Parties | STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Jay YOUNG, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner. . Oral Argument |
| Court | Wisconsin Supreme Court |
REVIEW of a published decision of the Court of Appeals, 180 Wis.2d 700, 511 N.W.2d 309 (1993), affirming an order of the Circuit Court of Milwaukee County, John A. Franke, Judge. Affirmed.
For the defendant-appellant-petitioner there was a brief by Michael J. Steinle and Law Office of Michael J. Steinle, Milwaukee and oral argument by Michael J. Steinle.
For the plaintiff-respondent the cause was argued by Marguerite M. Moeller, Asst. Atty. Gen., with whom on the brief was James E. Doyle.
The court is equally divided on the question of whether to affirm or reverse the decision of the court of appeals.
Justice Day, Justice Steinmetz, and Justice Wilcox would affirm; Chief Justice Heffernan, Justice Abrahamson, and Justice Bablitch would reverse. Justice Geske withdrew from participation.
Accordingly, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.
The decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Smith v. Kleynerman
...Wis. Public Serv. Corp. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of Wis. , 174 Wis.2d 705, 497 N.W.2d 723 (1993) (on bypass).63. State v. Young , 191 Wis.2d 393, 528 N.W.2d 417 (1995) (on petition for review).64. State v. Richard Knutson, Inc. , 191 Wis.2d 395, 528 N.W.2d 430 (1995) (on certification).65. St......
-
Antisdel v. CITY OF OAK CREEK POLICE & FIRE
...288 (1982); State v. Young, 180 Wis. 2d 700, 704, 511 N.W.2d 309, 311 (Ct. App. 1993), aff'd by an equally divided court, 191 Wis. 2d 393, 528 N.W.2d 417 (1995). The syllogism here is 1) Antisdel is a "subordinate." See Kaiser v. Board of Police & Fire Comm'rs, 104 Wis. 2d 498, 503, 311 N.W......
-
State v. Griffin
...words or phrases chosen by the legislature.”); State v. Young, 180 Wis.2d 700, 704, 511 N.W.2d 309, 311 (Ct.App.1993), aff'd,191 Wis.2d 393, 528 N.W.2d 417 (1995). The legislature may of course fine-tune the bifurcation scheme for misdemeanors if it chooses to do so. 4. Griffin argues that ......
-
State v. Gibbs
...unless to do so would lead to an absurd result. State v. Young, 180 Wis. 2d 700, 704, 511 N.W.2d 309 (Ct. App. 1993), aff'd, 191 Wis. 2d 393, 528 N.W.2d 417 (1995); see also DNR v. Wis. Power & Light Co., 108 Wis. 2d 403, 408, 321 N.W.2d 286 (1982). Therefore, to avoid an absurd result, we ......