State v. Young, 19133
| Decision Date | 03 December 1970 |
| Docket Number | No. 19133,19133 |
| Citation | 255 S.C. 198,178 S.E.2d 142 |
| Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
| Parties | The STATE, Respondent, v. Perry Lee YOUNG, Appellant. |
John W. Williams, Jr., Columbia, for appellant.
John W. Foard, Jr., Columbia, for respondent.
The appellant Young was indicted for grand larceny and robbery. The jury convicted him of robbery and the appeal is from such conviction and his resulting sentence of five years. He was represented at the trial by retained counsel of many years experience. Counsel on appeal was appointed for such purpose.
The record does not reflect that any of the questions argued on appeal were raised or passed upon in the course of the trial below. It is elementary that questions not raised in the trial may not be raised for the first time on appeal. See West's South Carolina Digest, Appeal and Error, k167. There being no questions properly before us for consideration, the appeal is dismissed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Hill v. Jones, 19137
... ... and (2) whether the award of the Commission is fatally deficient for failure to sufficiently state the reasons for the conclusion reached and for failure to apply the correct rule of law with ... ...
-
Young v. State, 19501
...ground that none of the questions argued on appeal had been timely raised in the course of his trial in the lower court. State v. Young, 255 S.C. 198, 178 S.E.2d 142. The matter is now here on appeal from an order of the lower court dismissing appellant's subsequent application for post-con......