Stearns Coal & Lumber Co. v. Tuggle
Decision Date | 08 January 1914 |
Parties | STEARNS COAL & LUMBER CO. et al. v. TUGGLE. |
Court | Kentucky Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Whitley County.
Action by Ray Tuggle, by next friend, against the Stearns Coal & Lumber Company and others. From a judgment for plaintiff defendants appeal. Affirmed.
Sharp & Smith, of Williamsburg, for appellants.
Robert Harding and John W. Rawlings, both of Danville, and R. L Pope and R. S. Rose, both of Williamsburg, for appellee.
The appellee, Ray Tuggle, at the time he received the injuries complained of, was under 16 years of age and an employé of the appellant company. When injured he was engaged in driving a mule hitched to four loaded coal cars, and was seated on the front end of the front car with his feet hanging over the end. Another loaded train of cars, in charge of a driver named Richmond, had started out of the mine about 25 minutes before Tuggle's train started, but for some reason not very clearly shown in the evidence the first train stopped at a trapdoor at the foot of a heavy grade, and when Tuggle, in the darkness of the mine, first discovered the train of cars standing on the track in front of him, he was only 60 or 70 feet away, and he was unable to stop his train. The mule he was driving, to use the language of Tuggle, When this experienced mule saw that a collision was inevitable and jumped out of the way to avoid it, the front car on which Tuggle was riding collided with the rear car of Richmond's train, thereby causing the injuries to recover damages for which Tuggle sued, obtaining a judgment for $2,000.
Although several grounds of negligence were charged in the petition it is shown by the record that the case went to the jury upon the ground that Tuggle was under the statutory age, and therefore his employment was unlawful, and that the company was further remiss in failing to furnish him a reasonably safe place and reasonably safe appliances with which to work. We think, however, that the accident was really due to the fact that Richmond stopped his train of cars at the foot of the grade when he should have gone ahead, and, this being so, the negligence in the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Emery v. Jewish Hospital Ass'n
... ... Ky. 314, 134 S.W. 200; Smith's Adm'r v. National ... Coal & Iron Co., 135 Ky. 671, 117 S.W. 280; ... Louisville, H. & St. L. Ry ... Co. v. Griesinger's Adm'r, 145 Ky. 1, 139 S.W ... 1059; Stearns Coal & Lumber Co. v. Tuggle, etc., 156 ... Ky. 714, 161 S.W. 1112; ... ...
-
McHenry Coal Co. v. Robinson
... ... Brown, 127 Ky. 732, 106 S.W. 795, 32 Ky. Law Rep. 552, ... 13 L.R.A. (N. S.) 1135; Stearns Coal & Lumber Co. v ... Tuggle, 156 Ky. 714, 161 S.W. 1112. In the Tuggle Case, ... supra, ... ...
-
Emery v. Jewish Hospital Association
...135 Ky. 671; Louisville H. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Lyons, 155 Ky. 396; Higgs Mfg. Co. v. Griesenger, Admr., 145 Ky. 1; Stearns Coal & Lumber Co. v. Tuggle, etc., 156 Ky. 714; Carter Coal Co. v. Love, 173 Ky. (b) The fourth paragraph was the one upon which the action of the trial court was chief......
-
Harris v. Rex Coal Co.
... ... driving mules attached to different trips of cars, are not ... fellow servants. Stearns Coal & Lumber Co. v ... Tuggle, 156 Ky. 714, 161 S.W. 1112. Motormen operating ... different ... ...