Steele v. State
Decision Date | 08 April 1914 |
Docket Number | (No. 3084.) |
Parties | STEELE v. STATE. |
Court | Texas Court of Criminal Appeals |
Appeal from Nacogdoches County Court; Geo. F. Ingraham, Judge.
Roy Steele was convicted of carrying a pistol, and he appeals. Affirmed.
J. F. Perritte, of Nacogdoches, for appellant. C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
Appellant was convicted for carrying a pistol. Appellant asked the court to charge that if the jury believed from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that the appellant did have a pistol, as charged, but "you further believe that the pistol was not in shooting condition, or if you have a reasonable doubt" of it, find him not guilty. He also complains of this paragraph of the court's charge:
The court qualified appellant's bill complaining of this charge by stating:
We think the court properly refused to give appellant's said special charge, and there was no error in giving the paragraph of his charge quoted and excepted to above. We do not regard Blackburn v. State, 58 Tex. Cr. R. 48, 124 S. W. 666, cited and relied on by appellant, as in point. The statute is: "If any person shall carry on or about his person any pistol, he shall be punished by fine," etc.
W...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Commonwealth v. Bartholomew
... ... it is no less a crime to carry without a license a revolver ... or pistol which is unloaded than to carry one which is ... loaded. Redus v. State, 82 Ala. 53, 54, 2 So. 713; ... Williams v. State, 61 Ga. 417, 418, 34 Am.Rep. 102; ... Lamb v. State, 7 Ohio N.P. 224; Steele v. State, 73 ... ...
-
Christopher v. State
...The violation charged is that of carrying a handgun. See Davis v. State, 77 Tex.Crim. 598, 179 S.W. 702, 703 (1915); Steele v. State, 73 Tex.Crim. 352, 166 S.W. 511 (1914); Caldwell v. State, 106 S.W. 343, 344 (Tex.Crim.1907). A rational trier of fact could have found beyond a reasonable do......
-
Smith v. State
...in question be an old or a new one, a good or a bad one, should have been given. Part of this language was used in Steele's Case, 73 Tex. Cr. R. 352, 166 S. W. 511, but it was stated by this court in Miles Case, supra, that the language used in the Steele Case had been misunderstood and mis......
- Samper v. State