Steiner and Munach, P. A. v. Williams
Decision Date | 23 March 1976 |
Docket Number | No. 75--688,75--688 |
Parties | STEINER AND MUNACH, P.A., Appellant, v. Willie F. WILLIAMS et al., Appellees. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Richard A. Kanner, Miami, for appellant.
Orr, Nathan & Williams, MiamiFor appellees.
Before HAVERFIELD and NATHAN, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.
Defendant seeks review of two final judgments entered in favor of Willie F. Williams, the first for $12,000 in her capacity as personal representative of Willie E. Williams, her deceased husband, and second for $3,000 individually following a jury trial in this action to recover for the intentional infliction of mental and emotional distress.
Willie E. Williams was operated upon and the defendant, Steiner and Munach, a medical professional association practicing anesthesiology, administered the anesthesia for a fee of $272. At the time of the surgery he had medical coverage with two different insurance companies to which he submitted the defendant's statement for services rendered. One of the insurers made part payment and the other insurer was to pay the remainder. However, despite several phone calls and statements to the second insurer, no results were produced. Approximately nine months after the operation, defendant mailed the following unexecuted claim to Mr. Williams:
which is past due and unpaid; for (As checked (X) below):
"THIS IS A COPY OF THE CLAIM TO BE FILED AGAINST YOU IN COURT FOR NONPAYMENT OF
YOUR MEDICAL ACCOUNT UNLESS YOUR PAYMENT IS RECEIVED IMMEDIATELY.
* * * * * * * * * * * *
At the time Mr. Williams received the claim, he was alone and upon his wife's return home, he exclaimed 'Oh, my God, I guess they're going to take our house.' Thereafter, he stopped eating and sleeping for some time. Mrs. Williams also was very upset and the next day took the form to her attorney who advised her it was not a lawsuit and to relax. Ten days later defendant was paid by the second insurance carrier. The Williams, alleging that they both suffered severe mental and emotional distress as a result of receiving the above form, filed suit against the defendant and sought both compensatory and punitive damages. While the suit was pending, Mr. Williams died and Mrs. Williams was permitted to proceed on her deceased husband's behalf. After the conclusion of the trial, the jury awarded Mrs. Williams on behalf of her husband $2,000 in compensatory damages and $10,000 in punitive damages, and on behalf of herself $1,000 in compensatory and $2,000 in punitive damages. Defendant perfected this appeal from the final judgments entered in accordance with these verdicts.
Defendant primarily contends that its actions do not constitute a claim for emotional distress. We find this contention has merit.
The law in Florida still remains that there is no recovery for emotional or mental injuries unless there has been a...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Davis v. Sheridan Healthcare, Inc., Case Nos. 2D17-829
...Florida state court appears to have made and which this court has not been asked to make in this case. Cf. Steiner & Munach, P.A. v. Williams, 334 So. 2d 39, 42 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976) (concluding that medical providers of non-WCL services violated section 559.72(10), Florida Statutes (1973), wh......
-
Catania v. Eastern Airlines, Inc.
...and weight of its actions would cause such mental distress." This count likewise was properly dismissed. See Steiner and Munach, P. A. v. Williams, 334 So.2d 39 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); and Brooks v. South Broward Hospital District, 325 So.2d 479 (Fla. 4th DCA A fourth count (found only in plain......
-
Habelow v. Travelers Ins. Co.
...sensitive or susceptible to emotional distress, or that Travelers had any basis to know she was. Steiner and Munach, P. A. v. Williams, 334 So.2d 39 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976), cert. denied 345 So.2d 429 (Fla.). Lillian has a more attenuated claim than most plaintiffs because the insult and the abu......
-
Clemente v. Horne, 97-2239
...Gov't Employees v. DeGrio, 454 So.2d 632, 638 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), decision approved, 484 So.2d 1 (Fla.1986); Steiner & Munach, P.A. v. Williams, 334 So.2d 39, 42 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); see also Eastern Airlines, Inc. v. King, 557 So.2d 574, 579 (Fla.1990) (Ehrlich, J., specially Assuming, with......