Stephens v. Noschang
Citation | 199 S.W. 706 |
Decision Date | 31 December 1917 |
Docket Number | No. 12461.,12461. |
Parties | STEPHENS v. NOSCHANG et al. |
Court | Court of Appeal of Missouri (US) |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Jackson County; Thomas B. Buckner, Judge.
"Not to be officially published."
Action by Mary A. Stephens against Frank X. Noschang and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal. Affirmed.
Langsdale & Howell, of Kansas City, for appellants. Park & Brown, of Kansas City, for respondent.
Plaintiff is the widow of R. T. Stephens, deceased, and defendants are officers and trustees of the Journeymen Barbers' International Union of America. Deceased was a member of such union, and his widow has brought this action to recover $200 as "death benefits," to which she alleges she is entitled as his widow. She obtained judgment in the circuit court.
It is provided in section 34 of the constitution of the union that:
"Upon the death of a member who is in benefit standing and has been a continuous, contributing member to the International Union for at least six (6) months, the following death benefits shall be paid: * * * From five (5) years to ten (10) years, two hundred (200) dollars."
And in section 113 that:
Deceased, a journeyman barber, joined the association on the 22d of February, 1895, when he was several months more than 50 years of age, there not being, at that time, any age limit to membership. But afterwards, in 1902, an amendment to the constitution was adopted, providing that no one could be admitted to beneficiary membership who was over that age. There was no right reserved in the constitution to amend it so as to affect prior rights.
As just stated, deceased first became a member of the union the 22d of February, 1895. He took a "retiring card" in 1900, being then 60 years of age. Then in 1902, after the 50-year age limit was adopted, he surrendered such card and resumed his membership. Then again, in April, 1905, he took out a "retiring card," and again, in the following November, he surrendered such card and resumed his membership and continued as a member to his death in 1915.
The defense is put on the ground that deceased was over 50 years old, and is based on the amendment to the constitution made after deceased joined...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Williams v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.
...... agent or the brotherhood or respondent without. appellants' consent. Piercy v. L. & N. Ry. Co.,. 198 Ky. 477, 248 S.W. 1042; Stephens v. Noschange,. 199 S.W. 706; Primakow v. Ry. Exp. Agency, 56. F.Supp. 413; Ill. Cent. R. Co. v. Moore, 112 F.2d. 959. (6) Because the acts of ......
-
Baker v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W.
...... such policies or certificates. Consequently, the repeal was. prospective only in its operation. [ Stevens v. Noschang. Co., 199 S.W. 706; 45 C. J., pp. 35, 44; Bolin v. Sovereign Camp W. O. W., supra .] Had it been. retrospective it would have been void, as ......
-
Williams v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co.
...agent or the brotherhood or respondent without appellants' consent. Piercy v. L. & N. Ry. Co., 198 Ky. 477, 248 S.W. 1042; Stephens v. Noschange, 199 S.W. 706; Primakow v. Ry. Exp. Agency, 56 F. Supp. 413; Ill. Cent. R. Co. v. Moore, 112 F. (2d) 959. (6) Because the acts of Keiser and Easth......
-
Baker v. Sovereign Camp, W.O.W.
...and did not purport to affect such policies or certificates. Consequently, the repeal was prospective only in its operation. [Stevens v. Noschang Co., 199 S.W. 706; 45 C.J., pp. 35, 44; Bolin v. Sovereign Camp W.O.W., supra.] Had it been retrospective it would have been void, as above From ......