Stephens v. State, 93-02759

Decision Date17 November 1993
Docket NumberNo. 93-02759,93-02759
Citation627 So.2d 543
Parties18 Fla. L. Weekly D2475 David L. STEPHENS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

PER CURIAM.

David L. Stephens appeals the summary denial of his motion for post conviction relief in which he challenged his convictions and sentences for burglary and two counts of sexual battery. We reverse the sexual battery sentences because they exceed the statutory maximum. We otherwise affirm the trial court's order.

The appellant pleaded nolo contendere to burglary with an armed assault and two counts of sexual battery armed with a deadly weapon. 1 He was sentenced within the guidelines and within the terms of the plea agreement to three concurrent terms of seventy years' imprisonment followed by life probation. The recommended guidelines range was life, the permitted range, twenty-seven years to life. Nevertheless, we must reverse because the sexual battery sentences are unlawful.

The appellant has not waived the legality of his sentences even though he agreed to them and even though he failed to question them on appeal. See Stephens v. State, 595 So.2d 566 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). A trial court cannot impose an illegal sentence pursuant to a plea bargain. Williams v. State, 500 So.2d 501 (Fla.1986), receded from on other grounds, Quarterman v. State, 527 So.2d 1380 (Fla.1988). A sentence that exceeds the maximum allowed by statute is fundamental error which can be raised at any time. Greenhalgh v. State, 582 So.2d 107 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

The sexual batteries for which the appellant was adjudicated guilty are life felonies, punishable by a term of imprisonment for life or a term of imprisonment not exceeding 40 years. Section 775.082(3)(a), Fla.Stat. (1987). When the trial court opts for a term of years instead of a life sentence, it may not impose a sentence longer than forty years. Sterling v. State, 584 So.2d 626 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991), rev. denied, 592 So.2d 682 (Fla.1991); Greenhalgh v. State, 582 So.2d at 108. Moreover, the total duration of a split sentence must fall within the statutory maximum. Wilson v. State, 622 So.2d 529 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). Thus, the concurrent seventy-year terms of imprisonment followed by life probation for the two sexual batteries exceed the maximum provided by law.

The burglary sentence, however, is not excessive because it is a first-degree felony punishable by life. See Wilson v. State, 622 So.2d at 530. This felony is punishable by a "term of years not exceeding life imprisonment." Sections 810.02(2) and 775.082(3)(b), Fla.Stat. (1987). The appellant's sentence of seventy years' imprisonment followed by life probation for burglary is thus lawful, being within statutory limits.

Accordingly, we affirm all...

To continue reading

Request your trial
17 cases
  • Jones v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • March 26, 2004
    ...Cheney v. State, 640 So.2d 103, 105 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Dyer v. State, 629 So.2d 285, 286 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Stephens v. State, 627 So.2d 543, 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). 5. Kendrick v. State, 817 So.2d 951 (Fla.2d DCA 2002); Williams v. State, 782 So.2d 980 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 80......
  • Fillyaw v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • September 5, 2003
    ...Cheney v. State, 640 So.2d 103, 105 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Dyer v. State, 629 So.2d 285, 286 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Stephens v. State, 627 So.2d 543, 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). 4. Kendrick v. State, 817 So.2d 951 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Williams v. State, 782 So.2d 980 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 8......
  • Madrigal v. State, 96-0128
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • November 20, 1996
  • Gonzales v. State, 5D01-1121.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • May 3, 2002
    ...Cheney v. State, 640 So.2d 103, 105 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Dyer v. State, 629 So.2d 285, 286 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Stephens v. State, 627 So.2d 543, 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). Even with a defendant's consent, the court is without jurisdiction to impose a sentence beyond the statutory maximum. Col......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT