Stephenson v. Kuntz
Decision Date | 15 June 1948 |
Docket Number | 9942,9943. |
Citation | 49 S.E.2d 235,131 W.Va. 599 |
Parties | STEPHENSON v. KUNTZ et al. (two cases). |
Court | West Virginia Supreme Court |
Rehearing Denied Sept. 20, 1948.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Nicholas County.
Syllabus by the Court.
1. 'The word 'heirs,' when used in an instrument of conveyance to designate the class of persons to whom an estate is conveyed, should be given its legal and technical meaning, unless there is some other language in the conveyance clearly showing that the word was intended to have a different meaning, or unless the circumstances of the case are inconsistent with such meaning.' Irvin v Stover, 67 W.Va. 356, 67 S.E. 1119.
2. Where a deed conveys land to a person 'during her natural life and at her death to go to her son Van M. Stephenson and his heirs and in the event that Van M Stephenson shall die without any heirs then the real estate herein conveyed shall go back to the surviving heirs of Madison Stephenson forever', the word 'heirs' used in connection with the phrase 'in the event that Van M. Stephenson shall die without any heirs', will be construed to mean child or children surviving Van M. Stephenson.
3. Madison Stephenson conveyed land to Mary S. Stephenson 'during her natural life and at her death to go to her son Van M. Stephenson and his heirs and in the event that Van M. Stephenson shall die without any heirs then the real estate herein conveyed shall go back to the surviving heirs of Madison Stephenson forever'. Madison Stephenson and Mary S. Stephenson died prior to the death of Van M. Stephenson, who died without child or children surviving him. Held: That Van M. Stephenson, upon the death of Mary S. Stephenson, took a base, defeasible, or qualified fee simple estate in the land conveyed by said deed, which, on his death without child or children surviving him, passed to the children of Madison Stephenson, surviving at his death, and to their descendants.
4. A devise and bequest 'to the trustees of the several churches of the Summersville Charge or Circuit of the Methodist Episcopal Church (North)', is not defeated, where, subsequent to the date of the will making such devise and bequest, and before the death of the testator, there has been a union or merger of the Methodist Episcopal Church, with the Methodist Episcopal Church, South, and the Methodist Protestant Church, under the name of the Methodist Church, and a rearrangement of Circuits or Charges of the Methodist Church, in the same community, which does not in any substantial way effect the intended distribution of the property covered by such original devise and bequest.
5. As a general rule, this Court will not consider questions fairly arising on the record in the trial court, and not decided by that court.
Eakle & Eakle and B. C. Eakle, all of Clay, for other appellants.
G. G. Duff, Breckinridge & Brown, and B. P. Brown, Jr., all of Summersville, for appellant John B. Breckinridge.
Wolverton & Callaghan and Brooks B. Callaghan, all of Richwood, W. G. Brown, of Summersville, and Jno. T. Simms, of Charleston, for appellees.
On December 7, 1887, Madison Stephenson was the owner of approximately 500 acres of land, situated on Peters Creek, in Nicholas County, and by deed of that date conveyed same to Mary S. Stephenson. Inasmuch as the basic controversy in this cause depends upon the intent of the parties and the construction of said deed, the same is incorporated herein in its entirety, and reads as follows:
This deed was duly acknowledged before C. Pierson, a Notary Public of Clay County, and recorded in Nicholas County on November 4, 1891.
Following the execution of the said deed, on a date not known, but certainly prior to the death of Van M. Stephenson, Madison Stephenson died leaving surviving him William M. Stephenson, Mary Stephenson Elliott, Dora Callison, Phlista Dunford and John Stephenson, his children and heirs at law. Whether any of his children predeceased him leaving issue, the record does not disclose. On March 27, 1920, Mary S. Stephenson died leaving surviving her, her son, Van M. Stephenson, the same person as that named in the deed of December 7, 1887, aforesaid. On February 3, 1945, Van M. Stephenson died testate, but without issue or any descendants surviving him, John D. Stephenson, a son of said Van M. Stephenson, having died without issue on November 7, 1943.
The will of Van M. Stephenson was executed on January 10, 1936, and was probated in the office of the Clerk of the County Court of Nicholas County on February 6, 1945. By said will, the testator, after providing for the payment of his debts, and for a monument, bequeathed to his son, John D. Stephenson, then living, the sum of $1. He then made the following disposition of his estate by a residuary devise and bequest, which reads as follows:
'I give, devise and bequeath to the trustees of the same churches mentioned above a certain cemetary in Summersville District, Nicholas County, West Virginia, containing five-tenths (5/10) acres, more or less, which I own by virtue of the deed mentioned below.
It will be noted that the real estate directed to be sold, and the proceeds thereof distributed, consisted of 241 acres. This is the same tract of land commonly referred to as 241.5 acres, and constituted the residue of the 500 acre tract conveyed by Madison Stephenson to Mary S. Stephenson, by deed dated December 7, 1887. It appears that a part of said larger tract had been conveyed by Mary S. Stephenson or Van M. Stephenson in their lifetime. In the said will, the testator named C. E. Stephenson as the executor of his will and estate.
The property of which, as contended by the plaintiff, executor, his testator died seized and possessed, was appraised at $20,271.02. The tract of 241 acres of land mentioned in the will was appraised at $11,000; the tract of 1 acre adjoining at $25; tangible personal property at $330.50; cash found in residence and deposited in bank, $4,422.47; and government securities $4,493.75.
The executor named in the will, C. E. Stephenson, qualified as such, converted the tangible personal property into cash paid the testator's debts, and made a settlement of his accounts before a commissioner of accounts. The said commissioner of accounts did not designate the beneficiaries of the testator's estate, but recommended the institution of a suit in equity to secure from a court of competent jurisdiction such designation, and for its general aid in the further...
To continue reading
Request your trial