Stevenson v. City of Abilene, 1212.
Decision Date | 05 January 1934 |
Docket Number | No. 1212.,1212. |
Citation | 67 S.W.2d 645 |
Parties | STEVENSON et al. v. CITY OF ABILENE et al. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Taylor County; W. R. Chapman, Judge.
Action by Ellouise C. Stevenson and husband against the City of Abilene and others. From an order sustaining a general demurrer to the petition and dismissing the case, plaintiffs appeal.
Affirmed.
J. McAllister Stevenson, John Sayles, and Jack Sayles, all of Abilene, for appellants.
H. L. DeBusk and Wagstaff, Harwell, Wagstaff & Douthit, all of Abilene, for appellees.
Appellant Ellouise C. Stevenson, joined pro forma by her husband, J. McAllister Stevenson, filed this suit in the court below against the city of Abilene, a municipal corporation, and West Texas Utilities Company, a private corporation, to recover against the city $80,000 damages for breach of an alleged covenant to deliver waste water from a septic tank, constituting a part of the sewer system owned by the city, on the lands of appellant. The West Texas Utilities Company was made a party defendant "in order that the ownership of the entire servient estate may be before the court in order that the court may make its decree granting relief prayed for." When the case was called for trial, the court sustained the general demurrer urged by the city, and, appellant declining further to amend, judgment was entered dismissing the suit, from which judgment this appeal was prosecuted.
Attached as an exhibit to the petition was a certain written instrument executed by Fred Cockrell constituting the primary basis of the alleged cause of action, which is here set out in full, as follows:
The covenant relied upon by appellants was that expressed in the concluding words of the instrument as follows: "* * * Grantee agrees to deliver all water from said septic tank on said lot No. 4, above described." The petition alleged that the city of Abilene is a municipal corporation operating under a charter granted to it by special act of the Legislature of the state of Texas, chapter 45 of the Special Laws of the 32d Legislature of Texas; that prior to the execution of the above instrument, the city granted a franchise to R. D. Richey and associates, and their assigns, for the purpose of constructing, maintaining, and operating a sewerage system in said city, in which grant it was provided that the city should have the right at any time after the expiration of 15 years to purchase the same upon certain terms therein specified; that such franchise was thereafter duly assigned and transferred to the Abilene Sewer Company, a private corporation, grantee in the above instrument, which constructed the sewerage system and put same in operation. It was further alleged that it was contemplated at the time of the execution and delivery of the instrument above copied that the waste water from the septic tank would be used by the said Fred Cockrell, his heirs, and assigns, for the irrigation of the lands then owned and thereafter acquired by him, his heirs, and assigns, and that one of the purposes and objects of the contract and agreement was the delivery of said water so that it could be, and would be, put to a beneficial use. On the 28th day of July, 1917, appellant Ellouise C. Stevenson acquired the said land and premises from Fred Cockrell and his wife, Emily B. Cockrell, as her sole and separate estate. The Abilene Sewer Company constructed and maintained said septic tank, ditches, pipes, and flumes, and delivered and emptied all of said waste water in accordance with its contract and covenant until it sold said system to the city of Abilene, in the year 1920. In the deed of conveyance from the Abilene Sewer Company to the city of Abilene was this language: "* * * Also, all of the rights of said Abilene Sewer Company, together with the obligations thereof, to be performed by it, granted the said Abilene Sewer Company by Fred Cockrell by instrument dated January 7, 1905."
The petition enumerated certain acts of the Legislature enacted in 1913, 1915, 1923, and 1925, relating to the pollution of streams, and alleged the unconstitutionality of each of them, following which allegations were these:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
City of Big Spring v. Board of Control
...to the attack made on it. The petitioner relies on the following cases to sustain his attack on the contract: Stevenson v. City of Abilene (Tex.Civ.App., 1934), 67 S.W.2d 645, writ refused. The court held that the City was exercising a governmental function. The first ground for the Court o......
-
Cox v. City of Pocatello
...Griffin v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Corporation, 10 Cir., 37 F.2d 545; Gardner v. City of Dallas, 5 Cir., 81 F.2d 425; Stevenson v. City of Abilene, Tex.Civ.App., 67 S.W.2d 645. We hold the general rule applicable, under the circumstances shown here, that the contract, having an indefinite term......
-
Assistant Comptroller General Weitzel to Administrator, Veterans Administration
...56 A. 990; state v. Minnesota railroad co., 83 N.W. 32; city council of Augusta v. Richmond county, 173 s.E. 140; stevenson v. City of abilene, 67 S.W.2d 645. A contract for an indefinite time has been construed as continuing in force for a reasonable time only, and has been sustained on th......
-
Wagner v. City of San Antonio
...use the underground pipeline constructed in 1962 without having committed a breach of its contract. Stevenson v. City of Abilene, 67 S.W.2d 645 (Tex.Civ.App. Eastland 1934, writ ref'd). The Plaintiffs' first point contending to the contrary is Since we have determined that there was no brea......