Stewart v. Mehrlust, 81-1203
| Decision Date | 15 January 1982 |
| Docket Number | No. 81-1203,81-1203 |
| Parties | Lawrence C. STEWART, Jr., Appellant, v. Jesse P. MEHRLUST and Betty H. Mehrlust, his wife, Appellees. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Douglas H. Smith of Douglas H. Smith, P. A., Lake Alfred, for appellant.
Joe L. Sharit, Jr., of Straughn, Sharit, Bunn & Chilton, P. A., Winter Haven, for appellees.
Larry D. Stewart, Jr., one of the defendants below, has appealed from a final judgment entered against him and James Dickerson. We reverse.
On or about March 17, 1980, Mr. and Mrs. Jesse Mehrlust, appellees, entered into a contract for the sale of certain real estate to the appellant and James Dickerson. The agreement provided that the purchasers were to make a $10,000 deposit. At the time of execution of the contract, the purchasers failed to tender the deposit. However, the appellees signed the contract and were willing to proceed with the sale of the property. The buyers defaulted and the appellees brought suit for the amount of the deposit. The trial court entered judgment against the buyer for $10,000 plus interest and attorney's fees.
The contract provided:
U. DEFAULT: If Buyer fails to perform this Contract within the time specified, the deposit(s) paid by the Buyer aforesaid may be retained by or for the account of Seller as liquidated damages, consideration for the execution of this Contract and in full settlement of any claims; whereupon all parties shall be relieved of all obligations under the Contract; or Seller, at his option, may proceed at law or in equity to enforce his legal rights under this Contract.
When a real estate contract provides that if a sale is not closed because of the fault of the buyer, the deposit paid under the contract is to be retained by the seller, the seller cannot recover a deposit not actually made. Campbell v. Salman, 384 So.2d 1331 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).
The appellant did not tender a deposit, so there was nothing to be retained by the sellers. Since appellee did not seek to recover the difference, if any, between the agreed purchase price and the actual value of the property at the time of the breach, judgment should have been entered for the appellant. See Campbell v. Salman.
We reverse and remand for the entry of a judgment for the appellant.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Newcastle Properties, Inc. v. Shalowitz
...Corp. v. Hooker Homes, Inc. (Fla.App.1987), 518 So.2d 922, Makris v. Williams (Fla.App.1983), 426 So.2d 1186, Stewart v. Mehrlust (Fla.App.1982), 409 So.2d 1085, Giammattei v. Egan (1949), 135 Conn. 666, 68 A.2d 129, Supreme Court Rule 366(b)(1)(i) (134 Ill.2d R. 366(b)(1)(i)), and the Rest......
-
In re Ocean Blue Leasehold Property LLC
...paid under the contract is to be retained by the seller, the seller cannot recover a deposit not actually made." Stewart v. Mehrlust, 409 So.2d 1085, 1086 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982)(reversing a trial court judgment awarding seller earnest money deposit not paid by defaulting buyer); Campbell v. Sal......
-
Alchar Hardware Co., Inc., In re
...paid under the contract is to be retained by the seller, the seller cannot recover a deposit not actually made." Stewart v. Mehrlust, 409 So.2d 1085, 1086 (2d DCA Fla.1982); see also Campbell v. Salman, 384 So.2d 1331, 1332-33 (3d DCA Fla.1980). In Makris v. Williams, 426 So.2d 1186 (4th DC......
-
Wilson v. Woodward
...the deposit paid under the contract can be retained by seller, the seller can only recover a deposit actually made. Stewart v. Mehrlust, 409 So.2d 1085 (Fla. 2d DCA1982). Under this principle of law, it can be argued that because the extension fees were not placed with the escrow agent name......