Stewart v. Putnam
Decision Date | 18 September 1879 |
Citation | 127 Mass. 403 |
Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Parties | John G. Stewart, Jr. v. William L. Putnam & another, trustees |
Argued November 13, 1878 [Syllabus Material]
Suffolk. Tort for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff by reason of the alleged negligence of the defendants in leaving a coal-hole uncovered in the sidewalk in front of a building on Exchange Place in Boston, whereby the plaintiff fell into the hole and was injured. Trial in this court, before Morton J., who reported the case for the determination of the full court in substance as follows:
It was admitted that Exchange Place, including the sidewalk, was a public highway; that, at the time of the accident, the defendants were seised in fee of the building and the land on which it stood, as trustees under the will of William S Perry, deceased that on January 20, 1872, Perry, who then owned the building, leased it for the term of ten years from that date to Elijah D. Goodrich, the lessee to make all repairs, outside as well as inside, at his own cost, and to have the right to surrender the lease at the end of the first five years of the term, by giving six months notice in writing; and that on October 1, 1876, the defendants and Goodrich made a contract under seal, which was in force when the plaintiff was injured. Annexed to the report was a copy of this contract, signed by one of the trustees and by Goodrich, which, after reciting that Goodrich was entitled to terminate the lease on January 1, 1877, by giving notice thereof, and had given notice, which had been accepted by the trustees, so that the lease would thereby terminate on January 1, 1877, proceeded as follows:
It was in evidence, for the plaintiff, that on November 23, 1876, at the time the injuries were received, Goodrich, under this contract, had the general care and control of the building including the cellar under the building and under the sidewalk, and of the coal-hole, and that no other person had any occupancy, care or control of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ruehl v. Lidgerwood Rural Telephone Company
... ... Sullivan, 112 Ind. 451, 2 Am. St. Rep ... 209, 14 N.E. 566; Bonaparte v. Wiseman, 86 Md. 12, ... 44 L.R.A. 482, 42 A. 918; Stewart v. Putnam, 127 ... Mass. 403; Pye v. Faxon, 156 Mass. 471, 31 N.E. 640; ... Gorham v. Gross, 125 Mass. 232, 28 Am. Rep. 224; ... Woodman v ... ...
-
Moore v. Townsend
...104; City v. Corey, 9 Mich. 164. The employer must at his peril see that due care is taken. Sturges v. Society, 130 Mass. 414; Stewart v. Putnam, 127 Mass. 403; Curtis v. Kiley, 153 Mass. 123; Wood, M. & S. § 316; 2 Thompson, Neg. 904; Wharton, Neg. § 180; Robbins v. Chicago City, supra; Wa......
-
North Chicago St. R. Co. v. Dudgeon
...care is used to prevent harm, whatever the nature of his contract with those whom he employs. Sturges v. Society, 130 Mass. 414;Stewart v. Putnam, 127 Mass. 403;Gorham v. Gross, 125 Mass. 232; Bower v. Peate, 1 Q. B. Div. 321, approved in Dalton v. Angus, 6 App. Cas. 740, 4 Q. B. Div. 162, ......
-
Flynn v. Butler
... ... vicinity. Bower v. Peate, 1 Q. B. Div. 321; ... Pickard v. Smith, 10 C. B. (N. S.) 470; Stewart ... v. Putnam, 127 Mass. 403; Woodman v. Metropolitan ... Railroad, 149 Mass. 335, 340, 21 N.E. 482, 4 L. R. A ... 213, 14 Am. St. Rep. 427; ... ...