Stewart v. State, CR
| Decision Date | 17 January 1989 |
| Docket Number | No. CR,CR |
| Citation | 297 Ark. 429,762 S.W.2d 794 |
| Parties | Barry STEWART, Appellant, v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee. 88-125. |
| Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
William R. Simpson, Public Defender, Little Rock, for appellant.
Jeannette Denhammcclendon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Little Rock, for appellee.
The appellant was convicted of the rape of a ten year old girl and was sentenced to life imprisonment. On appeal he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction. We affirm the conviction.
The victim was the daughter of the appellant's former girlfriend. The child testified that in November of 1987, she and her younger cousin accompanied the appellant on a trip to a laundromat. The appellant had brought along other children, who were his relatives.
The appellant told the victim he would take her to the store to get some candy. They left the laundromat alone, leaving the other children behind. After going to the store, the appellant drove to a dead-end street. At trial, the victim gave the following description of the incident:
He put his private spot inside of mine.
He got on top of me. He put his private spot in mine.
Q. When he got on top of you, what did he do then?
A. He started going up and down.
Q. Was he inside of you?
A. Yes.
The following January, the victim's two-year old cousin was taken to the doctor and diagnosed as having gonorrhea. Consequently, all other members of the household were tested. The victim tested positive. At that point, she revealed that the appellant had raped her. The child's mother testified that her daughter had been withdrawn and had been in and out of the bathroom several times the night of the incident. But until the doctor's visit, the mother did not know of the rape.
The examining physician testified that the child's genital area showed no trauma or bruising, but she did in fact have gonorrhea, and the opening in her hymen was suspiciously large, indicating sexual abuse.
After the state's presentation of the above mentioned evidence, the defense moved for a directed verdict. The trial judge denied the motion.
Stewart's argument is the state's evidence was insufficient because the anatomical terms in the rape statute were not used by the victim in describing the incident. Stewart also argues that the state's witnesses were not credible.
The appellant was charged with having sexual intercourse with a person less than 14 years of age. Sexual intercourse is defined as penetration, however slight, of a vagina by a penis. See Ark.Code Ann. § 5-14-101(9) (1987).
In a rape case, the requirement of substantial evidence is satisfied by the rape victim's testimony alone. There need not be corroboration. Roper v. State, 296 Ark. 292, 756 S.W.2d 124 (1988). In this case the victim's testimony is sufficient if it can be said that her use of child-like terms to describe the act of intercourse constitutes substantial evidence.
We have held that, even though a child may not use correct terms for a body part but instead uses his own terms or demonstrates a knowledge of what and where those body parts...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
McKinney v. State
...at the time of the incident. We have long held, however, that credibility of witnesses is for the jury to determine. Stewart v. State, 297 Ark. 429, 762 S.W.2d 794 (1989). McKinney further contends that the jury relied on circumstantial for their finding of premeditation and deliberation, a......
-
Murphy v. State
...intercourse. Stewart v. State, 297 Ark. 429, 762 S.W.2d 794 (1989). We affirm a conviction if substantial evidence exists to support it. Id. evidence is that which is of sufficient force and character that will, with reasonable certainty, compel a conclusion one way or the other, without re......
-
Shankle v. State
...S.W.2d 456 (1987). The weight of the evidence and the credibility of a witness are matters for the jury to resolve. Stewart v. State, 297 Ark. 429, 762 S.W.2d 794 (1989). Appellant's fourth argument questions the trial court's allowing Officer Samuel White to testify that, when appellant wa......
-
Holloway v. State, CR
...is sufficient for a jury to believe that a sexual offense occurred, if she describes where those parts are. Stewart v. State, 297 Ark. 429, 762 S.W.2d 794 (1989). She did that in this case when she said her "PG" was in the front and her bottom was in the back. J.R. testified that the appell......