Stieber v. Wensel
Decision Date | 31 March 1854 |
Citation | 19 Mo. 513 |
Parties | STIEBER AND WIFE, Respondents, v. WENSEL, Appellant. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
1. Under the new code, (art. 7, sec. 10,) in an action of libel or slander, a petition is sufficient, which states that the defamatory matter was published or spoken of the plaintiff, without stating any extrinsic facts for the purpose of showing its application.
2. Words which involve a charge of adultery are actionable by statute, without alleging special damage.
Appeal from St. Louis Law Commissioner's Court.
The petition alleged that the defendant spoke, in the German lan guage, of and concerning the plaintiff, Mrs. Stieber, and another woman, false and slanderous words, which being translated are as follows: “Ye are whores; ye carry on roguery and are rogues; ye go to church and whore with the priests.” The petition contained no other material averment, and stated special damage. A demurrer was overruled, and after judgment for the plaintiff, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment, which motion being overruled, he appealed to this court.
Delafield & Kribben, for appellant.
1. The words are not actionable in themselves and no special damage is alleged. They do not necessarily imply a charge of adultery against the plaintiff's wife, and if they do, this should have been alleged in the petition.
T. C. Reynolds & Garesche, for respondents.
to state in the petition any extrinsic facts, for the purpose of showing the application to the plaintiff of the defamatory matter out of which the cause of action arose; but it shall be sufficient to state generally that the same was published or spoken concerning the plaintiff.” The form of such petition, given in the code, corresponds with this provision. The petition, in the present case, is good under the code, as it alleges that the words were spoken of the plaintiff, Mrs. Stieber.
The judgment is affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Cook v. Globe Printing Co.
...for $1,000. Affirmed. Gardner v. Self, 15 Mo. 480. Slander. "Stealing a dollar." Judgment for plaintiff for $250. Affirmed. Steiber v. Wensel, 19 Mo. 513. Slander. "Ye are whores." Female plaintiff. Judgment for plaintiff; no amount given. Affirmed. Perselly v. Bacon, 20 Mo. 330. Slander. "......
-
Connell v. A. C. L. Haase & Sons Fish Company
...In that case, at page 632, this court after reference to the statute and to the decisions in Curry v. Collins, 37 Mo. 328, and Stieber v. Wensel, 19 Mo. 513, Graves, J., said: "The words charged to have been published in this case are actionable per se. To whomsoever they referred, they cha......
-
Diener v. Star-Chronicle Publishing Company
...35; Callahan v. Ingram, 122 Mo. 366; Caruth v. Richeson, 96 Mo. 186; Curry v. Collins, 37 Mo. 324; Hudson v. Garner, 22 Mo. 423; Steiber v. Wensel, 19 Mo. 513; Boyce Aubuchon, 34 Mo.App. 315; State v. Pulitzer, 12 Mo.App. 9; Doan v. Kelley, 121 Ind. 413; Curley v. Feeney, 62 N. J. L. 70. Na......
-
Cook v. Globe Printing Company of St. Louis
...for $ 1000. Affirmed. Self v. Gardner, 15 Mo. 480. Slander. "Stealing a dollar." Judgment for plaintiff for $ 250. Affirmed. Stieber v. Wensel, 19 Mo. 513. Slander. "Ye whores." Female plaintiff. Judgment for plaintiff; no amount given. Affirmed. Perselly v. Bacon, 20 Mo. 330. Slander. "Swo......