Stiger v. District Court In and For Boulder County, 26665
Decision Date | 19 May 1975 |
Docket Number | No. 26665,26665 |
Citation | 188 Colo. 407,535 P.2d 508 |
Parties | Clarence STIGER, Jr., d/b/a Longmont Auto Sales, Ltd., Petitioner, v. The DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR the COUNTY OF BOULDER, State of Colorado, and the Honorable Howard O. Ashton, one of the judges thereof, Respondents. |
Court | Colorado Supreme Court |
Joseph P. Jenkins, P.C., Estes Park, for petitioner.
Dolan & Dolan, Larry L. Hopkins, Boulder, for respondents.
Clarence Stiger, Jr., d/b/a Longmont Auto Sales, Ltd., petitioner, filed in this court a petition for relief in the nature of prohibition (C.A.R. 21) to prohibit the District Court in and for Boulder County and the Honorable Howard O. Ashton, one of the judges thereof, respondents (referred to herein collectively and singly as 'respondent'),
'from proceeding any further in Civil Action No. 74--2561--2, and that respondents be ordered to vacate and set aside the judgment of default entered October 16, 1974, and quash the writ issued shortly thereafter.'
We issued a rule to show cause. The case is at issue. We now discharge the writ.
Two actions are pending in the District Court in and for the County of Boulder wherein the National State Bank of Boulder as Administrator of the Estate of Jack E. Gale, Deceased, is plaintiff and the petitioner is the defendant. Both actions involve the same leasehold interest in property located in the City of Longmont. The first action, No. 73--2429--2, for $12,750 past due rent was pending trial at the time the default judgment for immediate restitution of the leased premises was entered against the petitioner in the second action. The trial court's denial of petitioner's motion to set aside the default judgment provoked the instant proceeding.
Petitioner alleges in his petition three grounds for invoking this court's jurisdiction:
Relief in the nature of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People in Interest of Clinton, 87SC200
...erroneous order as well as a correct one") (quoting In re Packer, 18 Colo. 525, 33 P. 578 (1893)); see also Stiger v. District Court, 188 Colo. 407, 409, 535 P.2d 508, 509 (1975) ("trial court ha[s] the jurisdiction to render a wrong as well as a right decision"). Furthermore, the conclusio......
-
Closed Basin Landowners Ass'n v. Rio Grande Water Conservation Dist.
...valid decree. A trial court has jurisdiction to render an erroneous decision, which may be reviewed on appeal. Stiger v. District Court, 188 Colo. 407, 535 P.2d 508 (1975). Consequently, a judgment entered within the jurisdiction of the court, even though wrong, is not subject to collateral......
-
Weaver Const. Co. v. District Court In and For El Paso County, 4th Judicial Dist., 27016
...court's order' granting or denying an application to set aside a default judgment is by appeal after final judgment. Stiger v. District Court, Colo., 535 P.2d 508 (1975). This holding reflects a general policy which disfavors the use of an original writ where an appeal would be an appropria......
-
Monaghan Farms, Inc. v. City and County of Denver By and Through Bd. of Water Com'rs, 1
...subject matter jurisdiction. See People ex rel. Clinton, 762 P.2d at 1387; Closed Basin, 734 P.2d at 637; Stiger v. District Court, 188 Colo. 407, 409, 535 P.2d 508, 509 (1975). Judgments based upon erroneous applications of law are nonetheless valid until successfully challenged. E.B. Jone......
-
Original Proceedings in the Colorado Supreme Court
...v. District Court, 130 Colo. 21, 274 P.2d 1017 (1954). 54. Weaver Construction, supra, note 18; Stiger v. District Court, 188 Colo. 403, 535 P.2d 508 (1975). 55. See, Snow v. District Court, 194 Colo. 335, 572 P.2d 475 (1977) (rule discharged upon finding no abuse of discretion). 56. Blank ......