Stocking v. Moury
Decision Date | 18 May 1907 |
Citation | 57 S.E. 704,128 Ga. 414 |
Parties | STOCKING v. MOURY. |
Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
It is competent for the parties to a series of promissory notes, maturing monthly through several years, to provide that in case default is made in the payment of any one or more of the notes at maturity, time being of the essence of the contract, the entire series shall become due and collectible at once; and if those notes, the maturity of which has been accelerated by the default, provide for the payment of 10 per cent, attorney's fees, the same may be collected in the manner provided by law. Kilcrease v. Johnson, 11 S. E. 870, 85 Ga. GOO.
The notice served upon the defendant in this case was a substantial compliance with the provisions of the act of the Legislature approved December 12, 1900 (Acts 1900, p. 53), regulating the manner of collecting attorney's fees.
(Syllabus by the Court.)
Error from Superior Court, Gwinnett County; C. H. Brand, Judge.
Action by David Moury against A. N. Stocking. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Affirmed.
On May 11, 1904, Mrs. Stocking executed to Curtis a series of promissory notes, falling due monthly thereafter; the last note being payable April 15, 1910. These notes were in dorsed to Moury. In the note it was provided that "time is of the essence of the contract, and, If any four of said series of notes shall not be paid promptly when due, then all the remaining unpaid notes shall be considered as due and collectible, and the right of action thereon shall, at the option of the holder thereof, at once accrue, " and that 10 per cent attorney's fees shall be paid, "if collected by law or through an attorney." On June 23, 1905, Moury served Stocking with the following notice: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Cone v. Hunter, (No. 18386.)
...shall, at the option of the holder thereof, become due and collectible. Kilcrease v. Johnson, 85 Ga. 600, 11 S. E. 870; Stocking v. Moury, 128 Ga. 414 (1), 57 S. E. 704. Such a provision may be contained in a deed executed contemporaneously with the notes as security for their payment, and ......
-
Jones v. Norton
... ... Johnson, 85 Ga. 600 (3), 11 S.E. 870; Smith v ... Champion, 102 Ga. 92 (3), 29 S.E. 160; Stocking v ... Moury, 128 Ga. 414, 57 S.E. 704; Harris v ... Powers, 129 Ga. 76, 58 S.E. 1038. In the case of ... Sneed v. Wiggins, 3 Ga. 94, the ... ...
- Stocking v. Moury
- Stocking v. Moury