Stockwell v. State
Decision Date | 29 March 1918 |
Docket Number | (No. 7534.) |
Citation | 203 S.W. 109 |
Parties | STOCKWELL v. STATE, by DAVIS, Commissioner of Agriculture. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Brazoria County; Sam'l J. Styles, Judge.
Suit by the state, by Fred W. Davis, Commissioner of Agriculture, against W. R. Stockwell. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Affirmed.
A. R. Rucks and Elmer P. Stockwell, both of Angleton, for appellant. Munson & Williams, of Angleton, W. A. Keeling, of Austin, and Wm. Burkhardt, of Angleton, for appellee.
This suit was brought by the state of Texas, acting by and through Fred W. Davis, commissioner of agriculture of the state of Texas, in his official capacity, against W. R. Stockwell, to have a certain Citrus trifoliata hedge on block 13, in Graham's addition to Alvin, belonging to defendant, declared and adjudged a nuisance and ordered abated; and also for a writ of injunction restraining and prohibiting defendant, his agents and attorneys, and all other persons who may claim to be interested in said land and premises and hedge, from in any manner interfering with or opposing plaintiff, his deputies, agents, assistants, servants, and employés, in the destruction of said hedge, and that said injunction be and remain in all things perpetual. Judgment was rendered overruling defendant's plea in abatement, general and special demurrers, and sustaining plaintiff's demurrers and exceptions to defendant's answer, and granting the injunction prayed for by plaintiff.
Plaintiff's petition alleges, in substance that there is situate and growing upon premises owned by defendant and described as block 13 of Graham's addition to Alvin, Tex., a Citrus trifoliata hedge, and various Citrus trifoliata trees, all of which are badly infected with citrus canker. The remaining allegations are:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Serres v. Hammond
...to appellants in Livingston v. Ellis County, 30 Tex. Civ. App. 19, 68 S. W. 723; Crossman v. City of Galveston, 204 S. W. 128; Stockwell v. State, 203 S. W. 109; Riley v. Coleman County, 181 S. W. 743; Chambers v. Gilbert, 17 Tex. Civ. App. 106, 42 S. W. 630; Maynard v. Freeman, 60 S. W. 33......
-
Crossman v. City of Galveston
...by the Legislature to adopt such police regulations, has been uniformly recognized and upheld by the courts. In the case of Stockwell v. State, 203 S. W. 109, Chief Justice Pleasants, in an opinion not yet published, speaking for this court with reference to the law authorizing and empoweri......
-
Reagan v. City of Texarkana
...is not in accord with that announced by us in this case. That case, however, was decided mainly upon the authority of Stockwell v. State (Tex. Civ. App.) 203 S. W. 109, which was reversed by the Supreme Court. See Stockwell v. State, 110 Tex. 550, 221 S. W. 932, 12 A. L. R. 1116. It is but ......
-
Stockwell v. State
...W. Davis, Commissioner of Agriculture, against William R. Stockwell. Judgment for plaintiff was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals (203 S. W. 109), and defendant brings error. Judgments of Court of Civil Appeals and district court reversed, and cause remanded to district Elmer P. Stockw......