Stoker v. City of Minneapolis

Decision Date29 November 1884
Citation32 Minn. 478
PartiesEVE STOKER <I>vs.</I> CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS.
CourtMinnesota Supreme Court

extinguishing a fire near the place of the accident, on October 7th, the gully being about three feet deep and about four and one-half feet wide. The plaintiff's testimony was to the effect that she was crossing Fifth street, it being quite dark, and came to the ditch across which two planks had been placed. She tried the planks, and, being a heavy woman, was afraid they would not sustain her weight, and so went a few steps along the side of the ditch, when the bank gave way and she fell in, receiving the injuries complained of. She had no previous knowledge of the condition of the street.

Judson N. Cross, for appellant.

Thomas Canty, for respondent.

GILFILLAN, C. J.

The defendant insists that plaintiff's own evidence showed her to have been guilty of negligence that contributed to the injury, and that the case ought, therefore, to have been dismissed on its motion. On that point the evidence made the case a very close one, but we think different minds might fairly arrive at different conclusions upon it, and that the case was properly left to the jury.

Order affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT