Stolarski v. Family Servs. of Westchester, Inc.
| Decision Date | 23 October 2013 |
| Citation | 110 A.D.3d 980,973 N.Y.S.2d 725,2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 06850 |
| Parties | Arlene STOLARSKI, etc., appellant, et al., plaintiff, v. FAMILY SERVICES OF WESTCHESTER, INC., respondent. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Anthony J. Pirrotti, P.C., Ardsley, N.Y., for appellant.
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP, New York, N.Y. (John J. Doody of counsel), for respondent.
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P., THOMAS A. DICKERSON, SANDRA L. SGROI, and SYLVIA HINDS–RADIX, JJ.
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for wrongful death, etc., the plaintiff Arlene Stolarski appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Giacomo, J.), entered October 26, 2011, as, upon an order of the same court dated September 21, 2011, granting that branch of the defendant's motion which was to dismiss the cause of action to recover damages for conscious pain and suffering, is in favor of the defendant and against her dismissing that cause of action.
ORDERED that the judgment is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, that branch of the defendant's motion which was to dismiss the cause of action to recover damages for conscious pain and suffering is denied, that cause of action is reinstated, the order is modified accordingly, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, for further proceedings on that cause of action.
On October 15, 2005, the decedent, despondent over her breakup with her boyfriend, took an overdose of prescription medication in an apparent suicide attempt ( see Stolarski v. DeSimone, 83 A.D.3d 1042, 1043, 922 N.Y.S.2d 151). After she was hospitalized, she was referred to the defendant Family Services of Westchester, Inc. (hereinafter Family Services), for further treatment. The decedent had consultations with a social worker at Family Services on October 19, 2005, and October 26, 2005. Two days later, on October 28, 2008, the decedent shot herself in the head with her boyfriend's pistol, resulting in her death.
The administrator of the decedent's estate commenced this action against Family Services, alleging, in pertinent part, that Family Services' alleged negligence in treating the decedent's depression from October 19, 2005, until the date of her death on October 28, 2005, caused the decedent conscious pain and suffering. On the eve of trial, prior to the submission of any evidence, Family Services moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, arguing that the plaintiff could not recover damages in a wrongful death action for any conscious pain and suffering the decedent may have experienced prior to fatally shooting herself. In opposition, the plaintiff contended that she was entitled pursuant to EPTL 11–3.2(b) to seek damages for the conscious pain and suffering the decedent experienced due to Family Services' alleged failure to provide her with proper psychological evaluation and treatment from October 19, 2005, up until the date of her death. At oral argument on the motion, the trial court indicated that while the decedent could have recovered damages for pain and suffering caused by Family Services' failure to properly treat her depression had she not committed suicide, such damages could not be recovered in a wrongful death action. The trial court subsequently granted that branch of the motion which was to dismiss the cause of action to recover damages for conscious pain and suffering, inter alia, on the grounds that the decedent's depression already existed on October 19, 2005, when the decedent sought treatment from Family Services, and there was no evidence that Family Services caused it ( see Stolarski v. Family Servs. of Westchester, Inc., 33 Misc.3d 607, 930 N.Y.S.2d 824).
A motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action may be made at any time ( see Butler v. Catinella, 58 A.D.3d 145, 151, 868 N.Y.S.2d 101),...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Marcelina M.-G. v. Israel S.
...friends, and has family members to care for her, including her mother, as well as her uncle and aunt. Under these circumstances, the [973 N.Y.S.2d 725]record demonstrates that it would not be in the best interests of the child to return to Honduras ( see Matter of Alamgir A., 81 A.D.3d 937,......
-
Kritzer v. Ventura Ins. Brokerage, Inc.
...to CPLR § 3211(a)(7), failure to state a claim, "may be made at any ... time." E.g., Stolarski v. Family Servs. of Westchester, Inc., 110 A.D.3d 980, 982, 973 N.Y.S.2d 725 (2d Dep't 2013). While the parties themselves stipulated to a deadline for "dispositive motion(s)," 50 Misc.3d 837Brick......
-
Cabral v. The Rockefeller Univ.
...be dismissed. Analysis A CPLR 3211 motion may be made at any time, even during trial. Stolarski v Family Services of Westchester, Inc., 110 A.D.3d 980 (2d Dept 2013). Collateral estoppel is not applicable here, as RU and Turner do not cite a decision a prior action that would have preclusiv......
-
Kritzer v. Ventura Ins. Brokerage, Inc.
...§ 3211(a)(7), failure to state a claim, "may be made at any . . . time." E.g., Stolarski v. Family Servs. ofPage 5Westchester, Inc., 110 A.D.3d 980, 982 (2d Dep't 2013). While the parties themselves stipulated to a deadline for "dispositive motion(s)," Brick Aff. Ex. H, at 2, plaintiffs mai......