Stoler v. Stoler, 95-05128
| Decision Date | 06 September 1996 |
| Docket Number | No. 95-05128,95-05128 |
| Citation | 679 So.2d 837 |
| Parties | 21 Fla. L. Weekly D2013 David STOLER, Appellant, v. Anne B. STOLER, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
M. Lance Holden and R. Scott Bunn of Sharit, Bunn, Chilton, Holden & Stambaugh, P.A., Winter Haven, for Appellant.
John W. Frost, II of Frost, O'Toole & Saunders, P.A., Bartow, for Appellee.
The husband, David Stoler, appeals a final judgment awarding the wife, Anne B. Stoler, attorney's fees and costs. We find merit only in his argument that it was error to order him to pay all of the wife's attorney's fees and costs and reverse.
First, we conclude that there was no abuse of discretion in the trial court's determination of the amount of the wife's attorney's fees and costs, although some of the costs are not within the scope of the statewide uniform guidelines for the taxation of costs. See Payne v. Payne, 481 So.2d 551 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). However, it was an abuse of discretion to order the husband to pay all of the wife's attorney's fees and costs.
The parties were married for twenty-one years and have accumulated many assets. They have no minor children. The husband earns $291,000 per year as a physician, while the wife has no discernable job skills. The marital assets were equally divided, and each party received approximately $700,000 in such assets. In addition, the wife was awarded $8,000 per month in permanent alimony.
At trial, the testimony established that the disposable income of the husband was $10,927 per month, and the disposable income of the wife was $6,273 per month. Accordingly, the husband's disposable income was $55,848 per year more than the wife's disposable income.
The overall relative financial position and resources of the parties must be examined and not simply the isolated factor of income and earning capacity. In the present case, the wife was awarded permanent alimony of $8,000 per month. She will be able to use this sum to contribute to the payment of her own attorney's fees and costs without significantly invading her assets. Based on the facts in this case, the wife should pay a portion of her own attorney's fees and costs. We reverse and remand the case to the trial court to set a more equitable attorney fee and cost award in which the husband pays a portion of the wife's fees and costs but not all of them.
Finally, we affirm the trial court's finding that interest on attorney's fees and costs accrue from the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
- Neapolitan Enters., LLC v. City of Naples
- Bess v. Eagle Capital, Inc., 96-3275
-
Arena v. Arena
...Crick v. Crick, 78 So.3d 696, 699 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012); Pinder v. Pinder, 911 So.2d 870, 873–74 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Stoler v. Stoler, 679 So.2d 837, 838 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996) (holding that the wife should be responsible for a portion of her own fees and costs where the husband's disposable incom......
-
Ruberg v. Ruberg
...on June 11, 2002, reversing a trial court order granting Mrs. Ruberg temporary appellate attorney's fees. See also Stoler v. Stoler, 679 So.2d 837, 838 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996) (reversing order requiring husband to pay all of wife's attorney's fees where record showed that wife had sufficient ass......
-
Attorneys' fees and costs
...which is the date the trial court determined entitlement); Arabia v. Siedlecki, 789 So. 2d 380 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Stoler v. Stoler, 679 So. 2d 837 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996) (affirm interest on fees that accrued from date of entitlement and prejudgment interest my accrue on prejudgment amount); Q......
-
Family law fees - the high points and the current state of the law.
...526 So. 2d 1010, 1012 (Fla. 2d D.C.A. 1988); Blackburn v. Blackburn, 513 So. 2d 1360 (Fla. 2d D.C.A. 1987). [15] Stoler v. Stoler, 679 So. 2d 837 (Fla. 2d D.C.A. 1996); Green v. Green, 646 So. 2d 210 (Fla. 2d D.C.A. [16] Platzer v. Platzer, 626 So. 2d 690 (Fla. 4th D.C.A. 1993); Murray v. M......