Stone v. Commonwealth
Decision Date | 25 November 1940 |
Citation | 11 S.E.2d 728 |
Court | Virginia Supreme Court |
Parties | STONE. v. COMMONWEALTH. |
Error to Circuit Court, Wise County; George Morton, Judge.
Junior Stone was convicted of grand larceny, and he brings error.
Reversed and remanded.
Argued before CAMPBELL, C. J., and HOLT, HUDGINGS, GREGORY, BROWNTNG, SPRATLEY, and EGGLESTON, JJ.
A. N. Kilgore, of Wise, and George L. Taylor, of Big Stone Gap, for plaintiff in error.
Abram P. Staples, Atty. Gen., and Joseph L. Kelly, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for the Commonwealth.
This writ of error brings under review a judgment of the Circuit Court of Wise county, sentencing Junior Stone to confinement in the penitentiary for a term of one year, in accordance with the verdict of a jury finding him guilty of grand larceny.
The indictment upon which the accused was tried and convicted charged him and one Gilmer Shupe, jointly, with the felonious taking from the person of one A. P. Green, the sum of $26.
The indictment contained two counts, reading as follows:
Upon their arraignment, accused elected to be tried separately, and the jury found Stone guilty under the second count of the indictment.
It is assigned as error that the trial court refused to set aside the verdict of the jury because it was contrary to the law and the evidence.
The accused, a young man twenty-two years of age, is the son of A. E. Stone, store manager of the Peerless Coal Company, and bore a good reputation as to character, and so far as the record shows, was a law-abiding citizen. A. P. Green, the alleged victim of the robbery, was a neighbor and acquaintance of the Stone family, and lived in Glamorgan, Virginia.
On Saturday, June 24, 1939, Stone and Gilmer Shupe visited the town of Norton and spent the afternoon sauntering around the streets, visiting the movies, and together with two other young men, consuming a pint of whiskey purchased from the A. B. C. store in Norton. Shupe had with him $2.25, and Stone had $5.
A. P. Green and his eighteen year old brother were also visitors to Norton on that day and spent the afternoon sauntering around the town, partaking of refreshments in a restaurant, visiting the movies and drinking whiskey. Green, who had primarily visited Norton to bargain for a second hand automobile, had on his person the sum of $31. Sometime in the evening, Stone, Shupe and the two Greens met in a restaurant and in response to the request of Stone and Shupe, who said they were "broke" Green purchased a pint of whiskey and gave it to Stone.
It is not shown how much liquor Green had consumed during the day, but it is conceded that he was "somewhat intoxicated", as were Stone and Shupe.
Someone suggested that all of them go to a dance at the nearby C. C. C. camp. Green's brother decided to go home, and in the presence of Shupe and Stone, Green gave him one dollar from a roll of bills. At approximately nine o'clock at night, Stone, Shupe and Green left for the dance at the camp.
Green's account of the alleged robbery is as follows:
The further evidence of Green is to the effect that from the scene of the alleged robbery he went to the "shack" of a negro nightwatchman in the employ of the railway company and spent the night; that he did not notify the police that he had been robbed; that Sunday morning he went to the Virginia Hotel and saw Stone and asked him "something about the money", and that Stone said he "never got the money"; that he stayed in the hotel room of a man named Gilliam until evening, when he went to a dance hall, and from there to the home of his grandfather, where he spent the night; that during the day he drank some beer; that on the following Monday, a warrant of arrest was issued for Shupe and Stone.
The accused testified, in substance, that three months prior to the alleged offense, he was employed as a truck driver in the City of Staunton; that he gave up this job and returned to Wise county; that for three months he was unemployed, but thathe was insured under the Social Security Act and received the sum of $15 per week as unemployment insurance; that from time to time his father gave him money; that on the day of the alleged robbery he accompanied Gilmer Shupe to Norton, Virginia; that he had with him the sum of $5; that during his stay in Norton he visited a moving picture theater, ate lunch at a restaurant, and with three others, contributed to the purchase of a pint of whiskey costing sixty-five cents, a portion of which he consumed; that late in the evening, he and Shupe met Green; that Green had half a pint of whiskey which the three consumed; that Green purchased a pint of whiskey, and after taking a drink, gave the bottle to him; that he did not recall telling Green he was "broke", and if he did so, he was merely joking; that he saw Green with some money; that, in company with Green and Shupe, he proceeded to the dance at the C. C. C. camp; that on the way, he met a negro man named Goode, who had worked for his father and that they proceeded ahead of Green and Shupe; that he went to the dance and stayed at the camp until approximately twelve o'clock, when he and Shupe went to the hotel; that Shupe only stayed at the hotel a short time; that he paid fifty cents for a room; that he did not see Shupe again until...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Jones v. Com.
...some overt act, or he must share the criminal intent of the principal or party who commits the crime.' See also, Stone v. Commonwealth, 176 Va. 570, 576, 11 S.E.2d 728, 730, 731, and cases there cited; Foster v. Commonwealth, 179 Va. 96, 100, 18 S.E.2d 314, In the present case the evidence ......
-
Smith v. Commonwealth, 3110.
...These expressions by this court make entirely clear the conclusion required in this state of the record: In Stone v. Commonwealth, 176 Va. 570, 11 S.E.2d 728, 731, in the opinion by Chief Justice Campbell, it is said: "In Creasy v. Commonwealth, 166 Va. 721, 725, 186 S.E. 63, 64, Mr. Justic......
-
Hamilton v. Commonwealth
...to all of the numerous decisions involving a discussion of the subject. The most recent case on the question is Stone v. Commonwealth, 176 Va. 570, 11 S.E.2d 728, 730. There we read: "The question on which rests a decision of the case is whether the evidence adduced by the Commonwealth show......
-
James v. Commonwealth
...and admitted that he was in the car at the time. An aider and abettor is defined by Mr. Chief Justice Campbell in Stone v. Commonwealth, 176 Va. 570, 11 S.E.2d 728. Numerous cases are cited to support the rule that, in order to constitute an aider and abettor, the accused must be guilty of ......