Stone v. Stone
Decision Date | 14 March 1932 |
Docket Number | 197 |
Citation | 47 S.W.2d 50,185 Ark. 390 |
Parties | STONE v. STONE |
Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
Appeal from Howard Circuit Court; W. C. Rodgers, Special Judge affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Jas. S. McConnell, for appellant.
Feazel & Steel, for appellee.
Appellee is the widow of W. C. Stone, deceased, and appellants are his heirs at law, children by a former marriage, all adults. At the time of her marriage to said Stone, appellee was the widow of one Joe Caldwell, deceased from whose landed estate she claimed and was allowed a homestead which she has continued to claim, and the rents and profits from which she has continued to enjoy since Caldwell's death, more than 25 years ago. After the death of Mr. Stone and after letters of administration had been taken out on his estate (he having died intestate), appellee as widow filed her petition in the probate court for the assignment to her of her homestead rights in said estate. Appellants contested her right to a homestead out of said estate on the ground that she already had a homestead in her own right, which had been assigned to her out of the estate of Joe Caldwell, her former husband, and which was still in her possession, and from which she was still enjoying the rents and profits. The probate court denied her claim on this ground, and she appealed to the circuit court. Appellants then sought to have dower assigned to her by petition to the probate court which included the land claimed by her as homestead, which she opposed because it included the homestead claim, but the court assigned dower as petitioned by appellants. She appealed from this order. Both cases were consolidated in the circuit court by consent, heard together, and the court rendered judgment allowing appellee her homestead right in said estate as claimed by her, and also assigned dower to her in the whole estate after carving out the 80 acres allowed as homestead. This appeal is from that judgment.
The Constitution, article 9, § 6, which is § 5523, Crawford & Moses' Digest, provides:
Counsel for both parties agree that a proper decision of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Sulcer v. Northwestern Nat. Ins. Co. (of Milwaukee, Wis.)
...925. In Bruce, the difference between the homestead of the wife and the homestead of the widow is emphasized. See also, Stone v. Stone, 185 Ark. 390, 47 S.W.2d 50, where it was held that a wife could have rights in the homesteads of two husbands who predeceased her. We clearly recognized ra......
- National Fire Insurance Co. v. Kight
-
In re Page
...that Annette owned two other homesteads, 832 Chestnut and 580 Succession. Appellant's argument is not well taken. In Stone v. Stone, 185 Ark. 390, 47 S.W.2d 50 (1932), Ida Stone, the widow of Joe Caldwell, claimed and was homestead in her husband's estate and claimed rents from that estate ......
- Universal Sec. Ins. Co. v. Zambie