Storman v. Storman

Decision Date20 December 2011
Citation90 A.D.3d 895,935 N.Y.S.2d 63,2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 09307
PartiesKeith L. STORMAN, appellant, v. Glenn S. STORMAN, respondent.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 09307
90 A.D.3d 895
935 N.Y.S.2d 63

Keith L. STORMAN, appellant,
v.
Glenn S. STORMAN, respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Dec. 20, 2011.


[935 N.Y.S.2d 64]

Macron & Cowhey, P.C., New York, N.Y. (John J. Macron of counsel), for appellant.

Roy A. Satine, New York, N.Y., for respondent.

PETER B. SKELOS, J.P., JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, ARIEL E. BELEN, and SHERI S. ROMAN, JJ.

[90 A.D.3d 896] In an action, inter alia, to recover damages, in effect, for fraudulent inducement, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bunyan, J.), dated September 28, 2010, as denied his motion for leave to enter a default judgment against the defendant upon his failure to answer, and granted those branches of the defendant's renewed motion which were pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(5) to dismiss the first cause of action on the ground of collateral estoppel and as barred by a release.

[935 N.Y.S.2d 65]

ORDERED that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provisions thereof granting those branches of the defendant's renewed motion which were pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(5) to dismiss the first cause of action on the ground of collateral estoppel and as barred by a release, and substituting therefor a provision denying those branches of the defendant's renewed motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

In February 2008, the plaintiff commenced this action, inter alia, to recover damages, in effect, for fraudulent inducement against the defendant, his brother. The first cause of action alleges, among other things, that the defendant fraudulently induced the plaintiff to sign a waiver and consent to admit the will of the parties' deceased mother to probate, and that the defendant fraudulently induced the plaintiff to sign a deed conveying to the defendant certain real property formerly owned by the parties' deceased mother.

Previously, on February 20, 2007, the plaintiff filed a pro se petition for a compulsory accounting in the Surrogate's Court against the defendant, as executor of the parties' mother's estate (hereinafter the accounting proceeding).

On April 24, 2008, the defendant moved, inter alia, pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(2) and (5) to dismiss the complaint on the grounds of lack of subject matter jurisdiction and collateral estoppel, and as barred by a release. In an order dated December 22,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
15 cases
  • Pacheco v. 32-42 55th St. Realty, LLC, 2015-02587, Index No. 9773/14.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 11 Mayo 2016
    ...v. Breslin, 47 A.D.3d 873, 877, 850 N.Y.S.2d 604 ; see Warmhold v. Zagarino, 106 A.D.3d 994, 995, 965 N.Y.S.2d 359 ; Storman v. Storman, 90 A.D.3d 895, 898, 935 N.Y.S.2d 63 ; Steen v. Bump, 233 A.D.2d 583, 584, 649 N.Y.S.2d 731 ; see also Newin Corp. v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co., 37 N.Y.2d......
  • Sacchetti-Virga v. Bonilla
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 21 Febrero 2018
    ...v. Breslin, 47 A.D.3d 873, 877, 850 N.Y.S.2d 604 ; see Warmhold v. Zagarino, 106 A.D.3d 994, 995, 965 N.Y.S.2d 359 ; Storman v. Storman, 90 A.D.3d 895, 898, 935 N.Y.S.2d 63 ). Here, in support of their motion to dismiss the complaint, the defendants submitted an affidavit of their insurance......
  • Skyline Capital Grp. v. Wolinetz
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 22 Noviembre 2017
    ... ... denied if it cannot be shown that the scope of the release ... was intended to cover the allegations in the complaint ... Storman v. Storman, 90 A.D.3d 895, 898, 935 N.Y.S.2d ... 63, 66 [2nd Dept, 2011]; Zichron Acheinu Levy, ... Inc. v. Ilowitz, 31 A.D.3d 756, 820 ... ...
  • Desiderio v. Geico Gen. Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 5 Junio 2013
    ...the allegations in a complaint, a motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(5) to dismiss the complaint must be denied ( see Storman v. Storman, 90 A.D.3d 895, 898, 935 N.Y.S.2d 63;Kaprall v. WE: Women's Entertainment, LLC, 74 A.D.3d at 1152, 904 N.Y.S.2d 721). Here, the Release and Trust Agreement d......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT