Stout v. Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins. Co.

Decision Date04 December 1936
Docket Number11333,11359.
Citation189 S.E. 248,183 Ga. 649
PartiesSTOUT v. MASSACHUSETTS MUT. LIFE INS. CO. et al. MASSACHUSETTS MUT. LIFE INS. CO. v. STOUT et al.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

Rehearing Denied Dec. 15, 1936.

Error from Superior Court, Fulton County; Edgar E. Pomeroy, Judge.

Suit by Mrs. Dorothy Gatins Stout against Joseph F. Gatins, Sr., the Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company, and others. To review an adverse judgment, plaintiff brought error and the Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company filed a cross-bill of exceptions.

Judgment affirmed, and the cross-bill of exceptions dismissed.

See also, Jackson v. Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins. Co., 189 S.E. 243.

Syllabus by the Court.

1, 2. Under a proper construction of the deed of trust, the petitioner was entitled only to an equitable contingent remainder thereunder, and the trustee was vested with legal title to the entire trust estate.

3. A remainderman whose estate is equitable and contingent cannot during the existence of a precedent life estate, maintain a suit to cancel a security deed executed by the life tenant and the trustees, purporting to convey the entire trust estate.

4. The legal title being in the trustee, such trustee has the right to bring an action setting aside such conveyances or enjoining the threatened foreclosure thereof, on the ground set out in the present petition; and an equitable contingent remainderman, such as petitioner, can only act upon the failure or refusal of the trustee to do so.

In case No. 11333:

Harold Hirsch & Marion Smith, Welborn B. Cody, John P. Stewart, and J. K. Jordan, all of Atlanta, for plaintiffs in error.

J Walter Mason, Albert E. Mayer, John P. Stewart, James A. Branch, and Brandon, Hynds & Tindall, all of Atlanta, and John F. Handy, of Springfield, Mass., for defendants in error.

In case No. 11359:

Jas. Walter Mason and Albert E. Mayer, both of Atlanta, and John F. Handy, of Springfield, Mass., for plaintiffs in error.

Harold Hirsch & Marion Smith, W. B. Cody, and J. K. Jordan, all of Atlanta, for defendants in error.

HUTCHESON Justice.

Mrs. Dorothy Gatins Stout, daughter of Benjamin K. Gatins and granddaughter of Joseph F. Gatins, Sr., brought her petition against Joseph F. Gatins, Sr., the Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company, and Howell E. Jackson, Benjamin K. Gatins, and Mary G. Jackson as trustees under a deed executed by Joseph F. Gatins, Sr. This deed is as follows:

'Georgia, Fulton County: This indenture made and entered into this the 14th day of February in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred and twelve (1912), by and between Joseph F. Gatins, of the State of New York and County of New York, of the [183 Ga. 650] first part, and Trust Company of Georgia, as trustee, a corporation of the State of Georgia, and County of Fulton, party of the second part, witnesseth: that said party of the first part, for and in consideration of the sum of ten ($10.00) dollars cash in hand paid by said party of the second part to the said party of the first part, at and before the sealing and delivery of these presents, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, and for the trusts hereby undertaken by said party of the second part, hereinafter named, has granted, bargained, sold, and conveyed, and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell, and convey unto the said party of the second part, its successors and assigns, as such trustee, subject, however, to the life-estate of the party of the first part, which is hereby retained therein' (describing certain real estate known as the Georgian Terrace Hotel in Atlanta, Ga.). 'The party of the first part hereby expressly reserves to himself an estate for and during the time of his natural life in and to said property and every part thereof, and this conveyance is intended to embrace only the remainder interest in and to said property after the death of the party of the first part. To have and to hold the said bargained premises, together with all and singular the rights, members, and appurtenances thereof, to the same being, belonging, or in any wise appertaining, subject to the said life-estate of the said Joseph F. Gatins above reserved, to the only proper use, benefit, and behoof of the said party of the second part, its successors and assigns in fee simple, forever, [189 S.E. 250] but only as trustee as herein specified and provided, and upon the trusts hereinafter named.' Then follows the warranty clause.
'This conveyance of said property is made to said party of the second part as trustee upon the following trusts, to wit: (1) Said trustee shall in no wise interfere with the free enjoyment of said property and its rents, issues and profits, and of the life-estate herein reserved by the said Joseph F. Gatins for and during his natural life. (2) The party of the second part, after the termination of the said life-estate, shall hold, manage, control, lease, rent, and collect the incomes, issues, and profits from said property, including all rents and notes for rents reserved or taken by said party of the first part in his lifetime carrying out all leases which said party of the first part may have made which have not expired at the time of said first party's death, and out of the proceeds [183 Ga. 651] thereof shall pay all taxes, assessments, public charges, and do all necessary and proper repairs and improvements, and shall keep up and maintain the said property for and during the natural lives of the three (3) children of the party of the first part, to wit: his sons, Joseph F. Gatins, Jr., Benjamin K. Gatins, and his daughter Mary L., and dispose of the net surplus arising therefrom, as hereinafter provided. Said trustee is to have full fpower and authority in and about the said matters and shall have all the rights, powers, and authority over said property, except as to the sale thereof, as if it owned the same free of trusts, for and during the lives of each of said three (3) children, and of the final survivor of them. (3) After the death of the said party of the first part, the said trustee is authorized, and in its discretion, to pay over to each of said three (3) children an undivided one-third (1/3) of the net income from said property, during the life of such children, but shall not be compelled to do so, nor shall such income, or any part thereof, be subject to or liable for the debts, obligations, or undertakings of any of said children, it being the purpose of said party of the first part to leave the matter entirely discretionary with the trustee; so that the said income, or any part thereof, cannot be subject to any debt or liability of any of said children. In case of the death of either of said children, leaving children or descendants of children, then the said trustee or its successors will have the same right, and be under the same duty as to such child or descendants of children, as existed to said deceased child. Should any of said three children die without leaving children or descendants of children, then the said trustee is authorized, in its discretion, to turn over one half (1/2) of the said net income to each of the two survivors; should two of said children die without leaving any children or descendants of children, then said trustee is authorized, in its discretion, to turn over the entire net income to the survivor of said children of said party of the first part.
'(4) In no event is the said trustee or its successors to be compelled or required to turn over any part of the net income to any child or descendants of children; nor shall the same in any wise be liable for the debts of any or either of them. (5) Said trustee shall keep a correct account of the incomes, issues, and profits of said property and of the expenses and upkeep thereof, and any surplus income not turned over as hereinbefore provided [183 Ga. 652] shall be invested and an account thereof kept, and said investments shall at all times and in all respects remain as surplus income and be subject to the authority of said trustee or its successors, as though no such investment had ever been made thereof. (6) Upon the death of the survivor of my said three children, the said trustee or its successors, will convey the said property in fee simple, unconditionally, including any surplus income, or the investment thereof held by it, to the children or descendants of children of said three named children of said party of the first part, one third to the children or descendants of children of each, it being the intention of this indenture that they take this remainder interest hereby created in them, per stirpes. If any of said named children, however, die without leaving at the time of his or her death any children or descendants of children, or if there be none living at the time of the death of said survivor, then the part of such child so dying without leaving such children or descendants of children, or if there be none living at the time of the death of said survivor, shall go and be conveyed by the trustee to the children or descendants of children of the other two; and if two of said named children should die without leaving any children or descendants of children surviving, as aforesaid, then the entire estate shall go to and be conveyed by the trustee to the children or descendants of children of the remaining named child who dies [189 S.E. 251] leaving children or descendants of children. (7) If all of said named children should die without leaving any children or descendants of children surviving as aforesaid, then the said trustee or its successors will convey the said property in fee simple to the next of kin of said party of the first part, according to the laws of Georgia. (8) The said trustee and its
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT