Stover v. State
| Decision Date | 04 December 1986 |
| Docket Number | No. 43370,43370 |
| Citation | 350 S.E.2d 577,256 Ga. 515 |
| Parties | STOVER v. The STATE. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Donnal S. Mixon, Bondurant, Mixson & Elmore, Atlanta, for James Edward Stover, Jr.
Christine C. Daniel, Asst. Dist. Atty., Dallas, for the State.
David W. Ogden, Bruce J. Ennis, Donald N. Bersoff, amici curiae.
James Stover, Jr. was indicted for the offenses of aggravated sodomy and rape. He was convicted of sodomy as a lesser included offense of aggravated sodomy and sentenced to probation for a term of five years.
The evidence was in sharp conflict regarding the circumstances immediately surrounding the alleged sexual acts, but there was general agreement as to the events leading up to those acts. Stover and two male companions were riding about in a pick-up truck in the late afternoon or early evening hours. They happened upon Holly Marie Capes who was walking beside the roadway and gave her a ride. The foursome spent the next several hours riding around together drinking beer and visiting here and there. Eventually they drove down a dirt road into a wooded area and stopped. It was about 10:30 p.m. Capes' testimony was that Stover forced her to commit acts of oral sodomy upon him and to have sexual intercourse with him on the open bed of the truck while one of his companions remained in the vicinity. Stover testified these acts were willingly done on his promise to pay money later.
1. Stover seeks to have this court declare the Georgia sodomy statute, OCGA § 16-6-2(a), unconstitutional for violation of the right of privacy guaranteed by the constitutions of the United States and the State of Georgia. We do not reach those issues because Stover lacks standing to raise them in this case. Whatever the constitutional privacy rights may be of one who engages in sodomy in private places they do not attach to another doing the same in public. It has been suggested that banning of public sexual activity is consistent with protecting a liberty interest in private sexual activity. 1
We recognize that OCGA § 16-6-2(a) 2 criminalizes the act of sodomy without a distinction between public and private acts. But Stover's conduct was a public act. He complains of the overbreadth of the statute in that it would embrace private acts; however he fails to show " 'that his own conduct could not be regulated by a statute drawn with the requisite narrow specificity.' " Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 612, 93 S.Ct. 2908, 2916, 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973); Foster v. State, 250 Ga. 269, 297 S.E.2d 262 (1982). "A party has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a statute only insofar as it has an adverse impact on his own rights." County Court of Ulster County v. Allen, 442 U.S. 140, 154-55, 99 S.Ct. 2213, 2223, 60 L.Ed.2d 777 (1979). This is not a First Amendment case where the standing requirements have been relaxed in order to allow "breathing room." Broadrick, supra, 413 U.S. at 611-12, 93 S.Ct. at 2915-16.
2. Stover contends his conviction will not stand because sodomy is not a lesser included offense of aggravated sodomy.
OCGA § 16-1-6(1) provides an accused may be convicted of a crime included in a crime charged in an indictment when the crime not charged is "established by proof of the same or less than all the facts or less culpable mental state than is required to establish the commission of the crime charged...."
Under OCGA § 16-6-2(a), sodomy is committed when a person "performs or submits to any sexual act involving the sex organs of one person and the mouth or anus of another." The same subsection of the Code states aggravated sodomy occurs when a person "commits sodomy with force and against the will of the other person." (...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Christensen v. State
...See also Model Penal Code and Commentaries, Part II, § 213.2 at 371-72 (1980).24 Wasson, 842 S.W.2d at 487.25 See Stover v. The State, 256 Ga. 515, 516, 350 S.E.2d 577 (1986) (recognizing that the sodomy laws may impact privacy concerns "in private sexual activity"); Macon-Bibb County Water......
-
Powell v. State
...State, 200 Ga.App. 483, 484, 408 S.E.2d 497 (1991). Sodomy is an offense included in the crime of aggravated sodomy (Stover v. State, 256 Ga. 515(2), 350 S.E.2d 577 (1986)), and the evidence summarized in Division 1 authorized a charge on the law of sodomy as an included offense. Accordingl......
-
Green v. Georgia
...casual or hostile intrusion or surveillance.” Mauk v. State, 242 Ga.App. 191, 529 S.E.2d 197, 198 (2000) ; accord Stover v. State, 256 Ga. 515, 350 S.E.2d 577, 578 (1986). In Mauk, the defendant's sexual act took place in a wooded area adjacent to a public road. Mauk, 529 S.E.2d at 198. “Th......
-
Green v. State
...casual or hostile intrusion or surveillance.” Mauk v. State, 242 Ga.App. 191, 529 S.E.2d 197, 198 (2000); accord Stover v. State, 256 Ga. 515, 350 S.E.2d 577, 578 (1986). In Mauk, the defendant's sexual act took place in a wooded area adjacent to a public road. Mauk, 529 S.E.2d at 198. “The......
-
Narrative and jurisprudence in state courts: the example of constitutional challenges to sex conduct regulation.
...114, 115-16 (Ark. 1973); Franklin v. State, 257 So. 2d 21 (Fla. 1971); Lambeth v. State, 354 S.E.2d 144 (Ga. 1987); Stover v. State, 350 S.E.2d 577 (Ga. 1986); State v. Jose L., 99 Misc. 2d 922 (N.Y. Crim. Ct. 1979); Canfield v. State, 506 P.2d 987, 990 (Okla. Crim. App. 1973), appeal dismi......