Strawhacker v. State

Decision Date04 June 2015
Docket NumberNo. CR-90-198,CR-90-198
Citation2015 Ark. 263
PartiesLONNIE DOLPHUS STRAWHACKER PETITIONER v. STATE OF ARKANSAS RESPONDENT
CourtArkansas Supreme Court

PRO SE PETITION TO REINVEST JURISDICTION IN THE TRIAL COURT TO CONSIDER A PETITION FOR WRIT OF ERROR CORAM NOBIS

COUNSEL APPOINTED.

PER CURIAM

In 1990, Lonnie Dolphus Strawhacker was found guilty by a jury in the Washington County Circuit Court of rape and first-degree battery and sentenced as a habitual offender to an aggregate term of life imprisonment. We affirmed. Strawhacker v. State, 304 Ark. 726, 804 S.W.2d 720 (1991). Strawhacker subsequently filed in the trial court a petition for postconviction relief pursuant to Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 36.4 (1990), which was denied after a hearing. We affirmed the order. Strawhacker v. State, CR-00-1417 (Ark. Jan. 24, 2002) (unpublished per curiam).

Now before us is Strawhacker's pro se petition to reinvest jurisdiction in the trial court to consider a petition for writ of error coram nobis. His petition arises following the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) notifying him that FBI Laboratory Examiner Michael Malone, who testified against him at his trial, has been identified by the DOJ as an examiner whose work failed to meet professional standards. In addition, the prosecutor in petitioner's original trialinformed the DOJ that Malone's work was material to the petitioner's conviction.

In his petition, Strawhacker additionally requested appointment of counsel. This is the first petition to this court involving a defendant in Arkansas that the DOJ has identified as being affected by the examiner's failure to meet standards. This court has discretion to appoint counsel in postconviction relief matters. Hammon v. State, 347 Ark. 26765 S.W.3d 853 (2001). This court has stated that in regards to postconviction matters, there is no absolute right to counsel. Howard v. Lockhart, 300 Ark. 144, 777 S.W.2d 223 (1989) (per curium). Nevertheless, this court has held that if an appellant makes substantial showing that he is entitled to relief in a postconviction matter and that he cannot proceed effectively without counsel, we will appoint counsel. See id.

This court finds the petitioner makes the required showing that he may be entitled to postconviction relief. Therefore, given the complexity and first impression issues involved, he cannot properly proceed without appointed counsel. The court hereby appoints Jeff Rosenzweig as co...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Strawhacker v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • 20 octobre 2016
    ...a petition for writ of error coram nobis. Strawhacker also requested appointment of counsel, which we granted. Strawhacker v. State , 2015 Ark. 263, 2015 WL 3526397 (per curiam). We now grant Strawhacker's petition to reinvest jurisdiction with the circuit court to consider whether to grant......
  • Williams v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • 9 février 2017
    ...This court has stated that in regards to postconviction matters, there is no absolute right to counsel. Strawhacker v. State , 2015 Ark. 263, at 2, 2015 WL 3526397 (per curiam) (citing Howard v. Lockhart , 300 Ark. 144, 777 S.W.2d 223 (1989) (per curium)). Nevertheless, this court has held ......
  • Early v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • 2 décembre 2021
    ... ... criminal defendant has no constitutional right to counsel in ... a postconviction proceeding or civil action, this court has ... discretion to appoint counsel when there is a substantial ... showing that a petitioner is entitled to relief and cannot ... proceed without counsel. Strawhacker v. State, 2015 ... Ark. 263, at 2; Virgin v. A.L. Lockhart, 288 Ark ... 92, 702 S.W.2d 9 (1986). Early has made a substantial showing ... that he may be entitled to postconviction relief and that he ... cannot proceed without appointed counsel. The court appoints ... Robby Golden as counsel ... ...
  • Early v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • 2 décembre 2021
    ... ... criminal defendant has no constitutional right to counsel in ... a postconviction proceeding or civil action, this court has ... discretion to appoint counsel when there is a substantial ... showing that a petitioner is entitled to relief and cannot ... proceed without counsel. Strawhacker v. State, 2015 ... Ark. 263, at 2; Virgin v. A.L. Lockhart, 288 Ark ... 92, 702 S.W.2d 9 (1986). Early has made a substantial showing ... that he may be entitled to postconviction relief and that he ... cannot proceed without appointed counsel. The court appoints ... Robby Golden as counsel ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT