Street v. State, 92-0161

Decision Date30 December 1992
Docket NumberNo. 92-0161,92-0161
Citation609 So.2d 779
Parties18 Fla. L. Week. D147 David STREET, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Palm Beach County; Sandra K. McSorley, Judge.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Eric M. Cumfer, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and James J. Carney, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the conviction, but reverse the sentence and remand for resentencing. The trial court erred in sentencing appellant in excess of twenty-seven years without providing written reasons for departure. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.988(g). Because the trial court was under the impression that this case did not involve a departure sentence, it may consider on remand whether departure is appropriate, and, if so, shall set forth valid written reasons supporting departure. State v. Bentancourt, 552 So.2d 1107 (Fla.1989). See also Roberts v. State, 547 So.2d 129 (Fla.1989).

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; REMANDED.

HERSEY and WARNER, JJ., and WALDEN, JAMES H., Senior Judge, concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Street v. State, 4D04-4442.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • April 6, 2005
    ...minimum mandatory on each count to run consecutively. On direct appeal to this court his conviction was affirmed. See Street v. State, 609 So.2d 779 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). However, this court found error in his sentence, as he had been sentenced in excess of twenty-seven years, which was the ......
  • Gasparovic v. State, 92-0041
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • December 30, 1992

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT