Strnad v. Stevens
| Decision Date | 14 November 2018 |
| Docket Number | Docket Nos. V–22713–11/15A, V–22714–11/15A,2017–12059 |
| Citation | 85 N.Y.S.3d 776 (Mem),166 A.D.3d 789 |
| Parties | In the Matter of Roger W. STRNAD, Jr., Respondent, v. Lesley B. STEVENS, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
166 A.D.3d 789
85 N.Y.S.3d 776 (Mem)
In the Matter of Roger W. STRNAD, Jr., Respondent,
v.
Lesley B. STEVENS, Appellant.
2017–12059
Docket Nos. V–22713–11/15A, V–22714–11/15A
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Argued—October 2, 2018
November 14, 2018
Carol Kahn, New York, NY, for appellant.
Geanine Towers, Brooklyn, NY, attorney for the children.
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, J.P., CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, SANDRA L. SGROI, FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER
In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Margaret M. Mulrooney, Ct. Atty. Ref.), dated October 26, 2017. The order denied the mother's motion pursuant to CPLR 5015(a)(1) to vacate an order of the same court dated May 23, 2017, which, upon her failure to appear for a hearing, granted the father's petition to modify an order of custody so as to award him sole legal and residential custody of the parties' children.
ORDERED that the order dated October 26, 2017, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The father filed a petition to modify an order of custody so as to award him sole legal and residential custody of the parties' children. Upon the mother's failure to
appear for a hearing, the Family Court proceeded to hold an inquest, after which it issued an order granting the father's petition. The mother then moved pursuant to CPLR 5015(a)(1) to vacate the order, arguing that she had a reasonable excuse for her failure to appear in that she had overslept due to a migraine headache, and that she had a potentially meritorious defense to the allegations in the petition. The court denied the mother's motion, and the mother appeals.
The determination whether to relieve a party of a default is a matter left to the sound discretion of the Family Court. In seeking to vacate her default, the mother was required to show a reasonable excuse for her default and a potentially meritorious defense (see CPLR 5015[a][1] ; Matter of...
To continue reading
Request your trial
- Elias v. Massimillo
-
Mondelus v. Emile
...motion, as she failed to establish a reasonable excuse for her failure to appear at the scheduled hearing (see Matter of Strnad v. Stevens, 166 A.D.3d 789, 789, 85 N.Y.S.3d 776 ; Matter of Nwabueze v. Okafor, 166 A.D.3d at 781, 88 N.Y.S.3d 206 ; Matter of Xiao–Lan Ma v. Washington, 127 A.D.......
-
Langer v. Langer (In re Trust)
...the sound discretion of the trial court" ( Flexro, Ltd. v. Korn, 9 A.D.3d 445, 445–446, 780 N.Y.S.2d 184 ; see Matter of Strnad v. Stevens, 166 A.D.3d 789, 789, 85 N.Y.S.3d 776 ).Contrary to the petitioner's contention, the Surrogate's Court providently exercised its discretion in denying h......