Strode v. St. Louis Transit Company
Decision Date | 20 June 1906 |
Citation | 95 S.W. 851,197 Mo. 616 |
Parties | STRODE, Curator, etc., v. ST. LOUIS TRANSIT COMPANY, Appellant |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from St. Charles Circuit Court. -- Hon. E. M. Hughes, Judge.
Reversed and remanded (with directions).
Boyle & Priest and Edward T. Miller for appellant.
The following authorities hold that a release given by the injured party bars an action for damages arising out of the death, whether brought by the personal representative or for the surviving husband or wife, or for the benefit of next of kin: Rice v. Railroad, 33 S.C. 556; Hecht v Railroad, 132 Ind. 507; Diddle v. Railroad, 25 Barb. 183; Littlewood v. N. Y., 89 N.Y. 24; Re Taylor Estate, 179 Pa. 254; Walkerton v. Erdman, 23 Can. S. C. 352; Fowlkes v. Railroad, 9 Heisk. (Tenn.) 829; Holton v. Daly, 106 Ill. 131; Hill v. Railroad, 178 Pa. St. 223; Birch v Railroad, 30 A. 826; Safford v. Drew, 3 Duer 672; Monroe v. D. & R. Co., 84 Cal. 515; Goodsell v. Railroad, 33 Conn. 52; State v Railroad, 60 Me. 490; Senior v. Ward, 102 E. C. L. 392; Griffiths v. Earl of Dudley, 9 Q. B. Div. 357; Cooley, Torts, 263, 264; 2 Redf. on Railroads (4 Ed.), 250; Pierce on Railroads, 392; Pat. Ry. Ac. Law, 410, 508; 1 Shear. & Redf. Neg. (5 Ed.), sec. 140; Tel. Co. v. Cassin, 111 Ga. 575; Tiffany, Death by Wrongful Act, sec. 124.
Gerald Griffin and A. R. Taylor for respondent.
Dill might have had an action of his own, if he had lived -- and this right of action he could control -- but can he, by any act of his, destroy the cause of action which the statute says shall belong to his widow or minor children after his death? The Proctor case, 64 Mo. 126, only decides that the action is a transmitted action, and that, as the servant injured by the negligence of his fellow-servant never had a cause of action, therefore, there was none to transmit; but here there was a cause of action, and, by force of the staute, it is transmitted upon the death of the party injured, and it never does become a right until after the death of the party injured. The injured party could not sue for his own death as long as he lived. After his death, the statute declares who shall sue and recover, so that we submit that, the remedy for the death of a party, injured by the negligence of a public conveyance like a street car, being given by the statute to the widow or minor children, the injured party has no power, by any act of his, to release or in any manner affect the right so given, and the release given by the deceased in this case cannot affect in any way the right of action bestowed by the statute on the minor children.
OPINIONIn Banc
-- The facts of this controversy are so fairly stated by Valliant, J., in the opinion filed in Division One, 87 S.W. 976, that we adopt the same, which is as follows:
I. The instruction criticised and referred to above as well as in the motion for new trial, which was sustained by the trial court, is in this language:
"If the jury believe from the evidence that at the time of the accident detailed in the evidence, John Dill was suffering from phthisis pulmonalis, or consumption, and that he died from such disease, and that whatever injuries he received in said accident only hastened his death and were not the cause of the same, the plaintiff is not entitled to recover, and your verdict must be for the defendant; and that this is true without regard to whether or not the defendant was negligent at the time of said accident."
This instruction was clearly wrong and should not have been given; a similar instruction has been expressly disapproved by this court. [Fetter v. Fidelity & Casualty Co., 174 Mo. 256, 73 S.W. 592.] In granting a new trial upon this point the trial court was right and were it not for other propositions its judgment should be affirmed.
II. The defendant pleaded and proved a written release, signed and given by deceased, John Dill, in his lifetime. This release was in the following words:
"Witness: S. A. Jenkins." By F. Walton, Vicepresident.
The evidence fails to disclose that this release was...
To continue reading
Request your trial