Stroter v. Brackenridge

Decision Date27 May 1908
Citation118 S.W. 632
PartiesSTROTER et al. v. BRACKENRIDGE.
CourtTexas Court of Appeals

Appeal from Travis County Court; John W. Hornsby, Judge.

Action by R. J. Brackenridge against H. W. Stroter and wife. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal. Affirmed as to the mentioned defendant, and reversed and rendered as to the feme defendant.

See, also, 118 S. W. 634.

D. W. Doom and D. H. Doom, for appellants. N. A. Rector, for appellee.

KEY, J.

R. J. Brackenridge brought this suit against H. W. Stroter and his wife, Minnie Stroter, seeking to recover upon a written obligation for $160, with interest and attorney's fees. The case originated in a justice of the peace court, but was appealed to and finally tried in the county court. H. W. Stroter seems to have made no defense, but Mrs. Stroter pleaded her coverture as a defense. The plaintiff sought to hold Mrs. Stroter liable upon the theory that the contract was for the benefit of her separate property. The county court sustained that contention and rendered judgment against both defendants, authorizing execution to be levied upon either community property of the defendants or separate property of Mrs. Stroter. The defendants have appealed and present the case in this court upon several assignments of error, all of which relate to the liability of Mrs. Stroter.

The undisputed testimony shows that a tract of land was conveyed to Mrs. Stroter for a recited consideration of $500 in cash and a vendor's lien note for $300, signed by Mrs. Stroter and her husband. The deed also recites that the property is conveyed to Mrs. Stroter as her separate estate, but it does not show that the cash consideration paid was her separate property. Thereafter the plaintiff, Brackenridge, loaned Stroter and his wife $160, and received from them a written contract, the pertinent terms of which are as follows:

"(1) That the said R. J. Brackenridge, party of the first part, agrees, at the request of the said parties of the second part, to furnish them, at their fair cash value, the labor and materials necessary to be used in constructing the following improvements, viz.: A three-strand wire fence on the south line of a 165-acre tract with posts at the intervals of a rod (16½ feet) apart, the corner posts to be well braced, on the homestead of said parties of the second part, consisting of 165 acres, situated in the county of Travis, in the state of Texas, and more particularly described as follows: Known as the Henkel's tract of land a part of the Wilkinson Sparks one quarter league situated on the west side of the Colorado river about three miles from the city of Austin. (2) That the said H. W. Stroter and his wife Minnie Stroter, parties of the second part, in consideration of said labor and materials being so furnished, agree to pay the reasonable cash value of the labor and materials so used in constructing said improvements on their said homestead, amount to ($160) one hundred and sixty dollars, to the said party of the first part, on or before the 21st day of June, A. D. 1903, at Austin, in Travis county, Texas, with interest thereon at the rate of ten per cent. per annum from date until paid; and if an attorney is employed to collect the same, after maturity, an additional ten per cent. on the amount to be collected for attorney's fees; and the said party of the first part is hereby declared to have a mechanic's lien on the improvements so made and the said one hundred and sixty-five acres upon which the same are situated, to secure the payment of the money to become due for said labor and...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Mills v. Frost Nat. Bank
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 15 January 1919
    ... ... W. 359; Billingsly v. Swenson Land Co., 58 Tex. Civ. App. 67, 123 S. W. 195; Blair v. Teel, 152 S. W. 878; Smith v. Wilson, 32 S. W. 434; Stroter v ... Brackenridge, 51 Tex. Civ. App. 170, 118 S. W. 632, Id., 102 Tex. 386, 118 S. W. 634. If she had bought property from appellee, and given her ... ...
  • Fisher v. Scherer
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 26 June 1914
    ...the passage of the act of the 33d Legislature (chapter 32) amending said article. Wallace v. Finberg, 46 Tex. 35; Stroter v. Brackenridge, 51 Tex. Civ. App. 170, 118 S. W. 632. The evidence sustains the finding, if it does not conclusively show, that the ground upon which the attachment was......
  • Billingsly v. Swenson Land Co.
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 1 December 1909
    ...authorizes a married woman to bind herself by contract for expenses incurred for the benefit of her separate property. Stroter v. Brackenridge, 118 S. W. 632, 634. There is nothing to indicate that other testimony may be secured to strengthen the plaintiff's case, and therefore the judgment......
  • Stroter v. Brackenridge
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • 31 March 1909
    ...by R. J. Brackenridge against H. W. Stroter and wife. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appealed to the Court of Civil Appeals (118 S. W. 632). On certified D. W. Doom and D. H. Doom, for appellants. N. A. Rector, for appellee. BROWN, J. This is a certified question from the Court o......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT