Stroter v. Brackenridge
Decision Date | 27 May 1908 |
Citation | 118 S.W. 632 |
Parties | STROTER et al. v. BRACKENRIDGE. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Travis County Court; John W. Hornsby, Judge.
Action by R. J. Brackenridge against H. W. Stroter and wife. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal. Affirmed as to the mentioned defendant, and reversed and rendered as to the feme defendant.
See, also, 118 S. W. 634.
D. W. Doom and D. H. Doom, for appellants. N. A. Rector, for appellee.
R. J. Brackenridge brought this suit against H. W. Stroter and his wife, Minnie Stroter, seeking to recover upon a written obligation for $160, with interest and attorney's fees. The case originated in a justice of the peace court, but was appealed to and finally tried in the county court. H. W. Stroter seems to have made no defense, but Mrs. Stroter pleaded her coverture as a defense. The plaintiff sought to hold Mrs. Stroter liable upon the theory that the contract was for the benefit of her separate property. The county court sustained that contention and rendered judgment against both defendants, authorizing execution to be levied upon either community property of the defendants or separate property of Mrs. Stroter. The defendants have appealed and present the case in this court upon several assignments of error, all of which relate to the liability of Mrs. Stroter.
The undisputed testimony shows that a tract of land was conveyed to Mrs. Stroter for a recited consideration of $500 in cash and a vendor's lien note for $300, signed by Mrs. Stroter and her husband. The deed also recites that the property is conveyed to Mrs. Stroter as her separate estate, but it does not show that the cash consideration paid was her separate property. Thereafter the plaintiff, Brackenridge, loaned Stroter and his wife $160, and received from them a written contract, the pertinent terms of which are as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Mills v. Frost Nat. Bank
... ... W. 359; Billingsly v. Swenson Land Co., 58 Tex. Civ. App. 67, 123 S. W. 195; Blair v. Teel, 152 S. W. 878; Smith v. Wilson, 32 S. W. 434; Stroter v ... Brackenridge, 51 Tex. Civ. App. 170, 118 S. W. 632, Id., 102 Tex. 386, 118 S. W. 634. If she had bought property from appellee, and given her ... ...
-
Fisher v. Scherer
...the passage of the act of the 33d Legislature (chapter 32) amending said article. Wallace v. Finberg, 46 Tex. 35; Stroter v. Brackenridge, 51 Tex. Civ. App. 170, 118 S. W. 632. The evidence sustains the finding, if it does not conclusively show, that the ground upon which the attachment was......
-
Billingsly v. Swenson Land Co.
...authorizes a married woman to bind herself by contract for expenses incurred for the benefit of her separate property. Stroter v. Brackenridge, 118 S. W. 632, 634. There is nothing to indicate that other testimony may be secured to strengthen the plaintiff's case, and therefore the judgment......
-
Stroter v. Brackenridge
...by R. J. Brackenridge against H. W. Stroter and wife. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appealed to the Court of Civil Appeals (118 S. W. 632). On certified D. W. Doom and D. H. Doom, for appellants. N. A. Rector, for appellee. BROWN, J. This is a certified question from the Court o......