Stryker Corp. v. Zimmer, Inc.

Decision Date19 December 2014
Docket NumberNo. 2013–1668.,2013–1668.
Citation774 F.3d 1349
PartiesSTRYKER CORPORATION, Stryker Puerto Rico, Ltd., and Stryker Sales Corporation, Plaintiffs–Appellees, v. ZIMMER, INC. and Zimmer Surgical, Inc., Defendants–Appellants, and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products, Defendant.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Federal Circuit
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Editor's Note: The opinion of the Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, in Stryker Corp. v. Zimmer, Inc., published in the advance sheet at this citation, 774 F.3d 1349, was withdrawn from the bound volume because it was reissued and superseded March 23, 2015. For reissued opinion, see 2015 WL 1285782.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Stryker Corp. v. Zimmer, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Federal Circuit
    • December 19, 2014
    ...The opinion of the Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, in Stryker Corp. v. Zimmer, Inc., published in the advance sheet at this citation, 774 F.3d 1349, was withdrawn from the bound volume because it was reissued and superseded March 23, 2015. For reissued opinion, see 2015 WL ...
2 books & journal articles
  • Chapter §20.05 Enhanced Damages and Willful Infringement
    • United States
    • Full Court Press Mueller on Patent Law Volume II: Patent Enforcement Title CHAPTER 20 Remedies for Patent Infringement
    • Invalid date
    ...denial of reh'g en banc).[779] See Stryker Corp. v. Zimmer, Inc., 782 F.3d 649 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 23, 2015) (replacing withdrawn opinion at 774 F.3d 1349 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 19, 2014). The Federal Circuit observed that the district court's analysis . . . asserted that the "jury heard testimony" th......
  • End of the Parallel Between Patent Law's Section 284 Willfulness and Section 285 Exceptional Case Analysis
    • United States
    • University of Washington School of Law Journal of Law, Technology & Arts No. 11-4, January 2016
    • Invalid date
    ...Halo Rehearing Denial Order]. 9. Halo Elecs., Inc. v. Pulse Elecs., Inc., 136 S. Ct. 356 (2015). 10. Stryker Corp. v. Zimmer, Inc., 774 F.3d 1349 (Fed. Cir. 2014), withdrawn and replaced by Stryker Corp. v. Zimmer, Inc., 782 F.3d 649 (Fed. Cir. 2015), cert. granted, 136 S. Ct. 356 11. See H......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT