Stubblefield v. Sebastian

Decision Date26 May 1959
Docket NumberNo. 38457,38457
Citation340 P.2d 265
PartiesJack STUBBLEFIELD and State Insurance Fund, Petitioners, v. Cora Beatrice SEBASTIAN, Mother and dependent heir of Gerald Eugene Sebastian, Deceased; D. E. Stricklen, and the State Industrial Commission of the State of Oklahoma, Respondents.
CourtOklahoma Supreme Court

Syllabus by the Court

1. Where the prime contractor engaged an independent contractor to perform work and labor where the employees are covered by the Workmen's Compensation Law and said independent contractor does not carry insurance or otherwise comply with the liability provisions for his workmen the prime contractor is liable under the provisions of 85 O.S.1951 Section 11.

2. The death benefit provision of the Workmen's Compensation Act should be broadly and liberally construed in determining the question of dependency.

3. A finding of the State Industrial Commission of dependency under the death benefit provision of the Workmen's Compensation Act will not be disturbed on review where such finding is reasonably supported by competent evidence.

Original proceeding brought by Jack Stubblefield and the State Insurance Fund to review an award of the State Industrial Commission made to Cora Beatrice Sebastian, claimant. Award sustained.

Mont R. Powell, Mary Elizabeth Cox, James C. Hamill, Oklahoma City, for petitioners.

Horsley, Eptom & Culp, Wewoka, Dick Bell, Seminole, Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., for respondents.

WELCH, Justice.

Cora Beatrice Sebastian filed a claim under the death benefit provisions of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 85 O.S.1951 § 22 et seq., arising by reason of the death of her son, Gerald Sebastian. An award was made by the State Industrial Commission against D. E. Stricklen as employer and against Jack Stubblefield secondarily liable under the provisions of 85 O.S.1951 § 11. Jack Stubblefield and the State Insurance Fund, his insurance carrier, have brought this proceeding to review the award against them. They shall be referred to hereinafter as petitioners. D. E. Stricklen does not prosecute an appeal from the award.

The record discloses that Jack Stubblefield is in the termiting business in Ardmore, Oklahoma, and operates in several counties. D. E. Stricklen owns and operates a termiting business in Wewoka, Oklahoma. He likewise has certain territory assigned to him for his activities. Stricklen and Stubblefield hired their own workmen in their operations. Gerald Sebastian had worked for Stricklen on other jobs in which Stricklen was the sole employer. A few days prior to May 29, 1957, Jack Stubblefield called by telephone and asked D. E. Stricklen to go to Coalgate, Oklahoma, which was in the territory of Jack Stubblefield, and enter into a contract with a doctor at Coalgate for a termiting job. The contract was drawn in which the doctor agreed to pay $350 to Jack Stubblefield. Out of this $350, which was paid to Jack Stubblefield by the doctor in Coalgate, a substantial amount was paid to Stricklen out of which Stricklen paid his own laborers.

On May 29, 1957, while working under the house repairing the underpinning in order to termite, Gerald Sebastian was electrocuted.

It is first argued that there is no competent evidence to sustain the finding of the State Industrial Commission that D. E. Stricklen is an independent contractor of the prime contractor. Jack Stubblefield. Jack Stubblefield testified that both Stricklen and Gerlad Sebastian were the employees of Stubblefield. The State Industrial Commission found the relation to be that of independent contractor and prime contractor and we sustain this finding. Stubblefield testified Stricklen shared in the profits on a fifty percent basis of what was made after paying all expenses. A check for the expenses and for part of the profit was given to Stricklen.

In Commercial Lumber Co. v. Nelson, 181 Okl. 122, 72 P.2d 829, 830, it was held there was no evidence of an independent contract between the builder and the lumber company because there was no showing that the lumber company shared in any profits of the builder, but was interested only in selling the materials to the builder. Therein it is stated:

'* * * As pointed out in the case of E. D. Bedwell Coal Co. v. State Industrial Commission, 157 Okl. 227, 11 P.2d 527:

"A joint adventure is a special combination of two or more persons where in some specific venture a profit is jointly sought without any partnership or corporate designation."

We hold the evidence discloses without dispute that Jack Stubblefield shared in the profits of the contract made with the owner of the premises being repaired, and therefore Stricklen was the independent contractor of the prime contractor, Jack Stubblefield.

It is next argued there is no evidence that claimant was dependent on Gerald Sebastian. The record discloses that Gerald Sebastian was thirty-seven years of age just prior to his death. He had never been married; his schooling ended just before he finished his final year in high school. His principal source of income was from work with a seismograph crew. When in Wewoka he made his home with his parents. His father was at the time of the award, and had been for some time, city clerk. His salary was $345 per month.

Claimant, mother of Gerald Sebastian, testified that while working in Louisiana he sent her a money order for $175 in 1956;...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Boardman Co. v. Eddy
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • July 5, 1961
    ...of the Workmen's Compensation Act will not be disturbed on review when reasonably supported by competent evidence. Stubblefield v. Sebastian, Okl., 340 P.2d 265. Original proceeding by the Boardman Company, employer, and its insurance carrier, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, to......
  • Hogue v. Smith
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • June 30, 1964
    ...Construction Co. v. Osborn, 208 Okl. 554, 257 P.2d 1056; Oklahoma State Highway Department v. Nash, Okl., 297 P.2d 412; Stubblefield v. Sebastian, Okl., 340 P.2d 265; and Boardman Company v. Eddy, Okl., 363 P.2d An examination of the above cases disclose that we affirmed the order of the St......
  • Robberson Steel Co. v. State Indus. Court
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • July 6, 1960
    ...Workmen's Compensation Act should be accorded a broad and liberal construction in determining the question of dependency. Stubblefield v. Sebastian, Okl., 340 P.2d 265. Original proceeding by Robberson Steel Company, Employer, and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, its Insurance Carrier, Pet......
  • Akin v. Akin Distributors, Inc.
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • November 5, 1963
    ...State Highway Department v. Nash, Okl., 297 P.2d 412; G. I. Construction Co. v. Osborn, 208 Okl. 554; 257 P.2d 1056; Stubblefield v. Sebastian, Okl., 340 P.2d 265; Dierks Forests, Inc. v. Parnell, Okl., 331 P.2d 392; and Oklahoma State Highway Department v. Peters, Okl., 291 P.2d We do not ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT