Studley v. Studley
Decision Date | 29 October 1935 |
Docket Number | 29352. |
Citation | 263 N.W. 139,129 Neb. 784 |
Parties | STUDLEY v. STUDLEY. |
Court | Nebraska Supreme Court |
Syllabus by the Court.
1. A sentence to the reformatory for women at York, Nebraska, as created by chapter 238, Laws 1919, is a sentence to imprisonment in a " prison, jail or house of correction," within the meaning of section 42-301, Comp St. 1929.
2. A sentence of " not less than one year nor more than ten years," made under the provisions of the indeterminate sentence law of this state, is a definite sentence for the maximum term thereof.
3. Peyton v Peyton, 97 Neb. 663, 151 N.W. 150.
Appeal from District Court, Wayne County; Chase, Judge.
Suit by Darlene M. Studley against Russell A. Studley. From a judgment dismissing the action after a general demurrer to the answer was overruled, plaintiff appeals.
Affirmed.
H. E Siman, of Wayne, for appellant.
Troyer & Pardee, of Omaha, for appellee.
Heard before GOSS, C. J., and ROSE, GOOD, EBERLY, DAY, PAINE, and CARTER, JJ.
Appellant filed her petition for a divorce in the district court for Wayne county on September 26, 1933, wherein she alleged as ground therefor that the appellee had been convicted of a felony under the laws of Nebraska on July 8, 1930, and had been sentenced to a term in the penitentiary exceeding three years. There is no dispute that these allegations constitute a ground for divorce under the provisions of section 42-301, Comp. St. 1929. Appellee alleged as a defense that on March 4, 1931, the appellant was convicted of a felony under the laws of Nebraska and was sentenced to serve a term in the reformatory for women at York, Nebraska, of not less than one year nor more than ten years, and that said felony was committed in connection with the same transaction for which the appellee was sentenced. The answer also shows that appellant served eighteen months of the sentence in the reformatory at York. To the answer the appellant filed a general demurrer which was overruled. The appellant elected to stand on her demurrer and the trial court entered a judgment dismissing the action. From the judgment thus entered the appellant appeals.
The question for determination is whether the allegations of the answer are sufficient to constitute a defense. Section 42-301, Comp. St. 1929, provides in part as fol lows: The record discloses that appellant was sentenced to serve not less than one year nor more than ten years in the reformatory for women at York. At the time appellant was sentenced to the reformatory for women, section 83-1403, Comp. St. 1929, provided:
It will be noted that, under our statute as it then existed, a woman who had been convicted of a felony could be sentenced to the state penitentiary or to the reformatory for women at York. If she was sentenced to the reformatory, power was granted to the board of control to remove her to the penitentiary if she became incorrigible. It was also necessary that a sentence to the reformatory for women be in accordance with the indeterminate sentence law of this state, which applies only to certain classes of persons convicted of felonies and sentenced to the penitentiary. Comp. St. 1929, §...
To continue reading
Request your trial