Sturgeon v. Estate of Wideman, 41838.
Decision Date | 12 November 1980 |
Docket Number | No. 41838.,41838. |
Citation | 608 S.W.2d 140 |
Parties | Richard STURGEON and Shirley Sturgeon, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ESTATE of Josephine WIDEMAN, deceased, Defendant-Respondent. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Benson Cytron, House Springs, for plaintiffs-appellants.
Melville Ochsner, St. Louis, for defendant-respondent.
Proceeding for the reasonable value of personal services furnished by appellants, Shirley Sturgeon (hereinafter referred to as "daughter") and Richard Sturgeon (hereinafter referred to as "son-in-law") to Josephine Wideman, deceased, (hereinafter referred to as "mother") during the last four years of mother's life. The trial court directed the verdict in favor of the estate at the close of plaintiffs' evidence finding that daughter and son-in-law failed to prove that they expected to be paid. Under our scope of review, daughter and son-in-law are entitled to the most favorable view of all evidence and the benefit of all favorable inferences which can be drawn therefrom. Crouse v. Burkemper, 593 S.W.2d 234, 235 (Mo.App.1979). A directed verdict is a drastic measure and "... should be done only when all of the evidence and the reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom are so strongly against plaintiff that there is no room for reasonable minds to differ." Boyle v. Colonial Life Insurance Co. of America, 525 S.W.2d 811, 814 (Mo.App.1975); Crouse, 593 S.W.2d at 235.
Prior to November, 1973, mother lived in her own home. She had six children, five of whom contributed money to have someone care for her from time to time. Mother's need for care began in 1969. Her daughter-in-law began to stay with mother periodically and was paid by mother and most of the children, including daughter.
Mother moved into daughter's and son-in-law's home in December of 1973 when she was no longer capable of living alone. She remained there until her death in August, 1977. Daughter had a job but took care of mother when she wasn't working. When daughter was on the job, mother's nieces came to care for mother. They were paid by mother, daughter and four of the other children. Mother intended that everyone who cared for her should be paid.
When no family relationship exists, the law presumes an intent to charge for services rendered. Jaycox v. Brune, 434 S.W.2d 539 (Mo.1968). The defense of a family relationship is an affirmative defense and defendant has the burden of proof. Schanz v. Estate of Terry, 504 S.W.2d 653, 656 (Mo.App.1974). The existence of a family relationship, once it is established gives rise to a presumption that services rendered were intended to be gratuitous. Matter of Estate of Kunzler, 548 S.W.2d 212, 214 (Mo.App.1977); Schanz, 504 S.W.2d at 657.
A family relationship is ". . . members of a collective body under one head and one domestic government, who have reciprocal natural or moral duties to support and care for each other." Steva v. Steva, 332 S.W.2d 924, 927 (Mo.1960); Feely v. Birenbaum, 554 S.W.2d 432, 435 (Mo.App. 1977). Daughter and son-in-law were married. They had a family of their own. Mother moved in with them, arguably not for the purpose of establishing a family relationship but for the purpose of receiving round-the-clock care. Other relatives who cared for mother while daughter worked were paid for their services. Daughter was one of six children but carried most of the responsibility for caring for mother.
The presumption of gratuitous services springs from reciprocity of benefits, privileges, duties and obligations. Mother's inability to render any services is evidence that such reciprocity is lacking. In re Grogan's Estate, 82 Misc. 555, 145 N.Y.S. 285 (1930). Simmons v. Simmons, 357 P.2d 949, 951 (Okl.1960). Daughter, as an emancipated, adult child, cared for mother after a lapse of time during which there was no evidence of mutual services...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Washington
...is not defined by blood, but is a matter for a jury to determine based on the circumstances, citing Sturgeon v. Estate of Wideman, 608 S.W.2d 140, 142 (Mo. App. E.D. 1980). Appellant claims that his evidence was six years of filing claims for reimbursement, which demonstrate that the circui......
-
McMurry v. Magnusson
...4 (Mo.App.1963). When no family relationship exists, the law presumes an intent to charge for services rendered. Sturgeon v. Estate of Wideman, 608 S.W.2d 140, 141 (Mo.App.1980), after remand rev'd on other grounds, 631 S.W.2d 55 (Mo.App.1981). The defense of a family relationship is an aff......
- Cusumano v. Outdoors Today, Inc.
-
Sturgeon v. Wideman's Estate, 44183
...Wideman (decedent). The first successful appeal was from a directed verdict at the close of claimants' evidence. Sturgeon v. Estate of Wideman, 608 S.W.2d 140 (Mo.App.1980). The present appeal, comes after a jury verdict in favor of respondent (decedent's estate). The judgment entered on su......