Suffolk Cnty. Ass'n of Mun. Emps., Inc. v. Levy

Decision Date12 November 2015
Citation20 N.Y.S.3d 114,133 A.D.3d 676
Parties In the Matter of SUFFOLK COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, INC., appellant, v. Steve LEVY, etc., et al., respondents.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein, P.C, New York, N.Y. (Barry J. Peek, Hanan B. Kolko, and Max H. Sicherman of counsel), for appellant.

Lamb & Barnosky, LLP, Melville, N.Y. (Richard K. Zuckerman and Matthew J. Mehnert of counsel), for respondents.

REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P., RUTH C. BALKIN, ROBERT J. MILLER, and SYLVIA O. HINDS–RADIX, JJ.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, in effect, to review a determination of Alan Schneider, Personnel Director for the Suffolk County Department of Civil Service, dated June 29, 2010, and in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondents to treat employees of Suffolk County Community College as employees of Suffolk County for purposes of eligibility for promotions to positions with Suffolk County, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Asher, J.), dated July 9, 2013, which, upon, among other things, a decision of the same court dated March 28, 2013, denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The petitioner is a labor union representing employees of Suffolk County. Some of the petitioner's members work at Suffolk County Community College (hereinafter the College). Prior to 2010, the petitioner's members, including those working at the College, had been considered County employees with the right to seek promotions to positions inside and outside of the College pursuant to the Suffolk County Civil Service Rules. In 2009, the County and the College entered into a Sponsor Service Agreement and a Memorandum of Understanding of Procedures (hereinafter together the New Operating Agreement), which redefined the parameters of the relationship between the County and the College. A provision of the New Operating Agreement provided that the College and the County are independent entities and that neither entity's employees are to be deemed employees of the other entity.

In early 2010, Alan Schneider, Personnel Director for the Suffolk County Department of Civil Service (hereinafter the County DCS), determined that College employees would no longer be eligible for promotions to County positions, and that County employees would no longer be eligible for promotions to College positions. This determination was based upon his interpretation of the New Operating Agreement, by which he concluded that the College was to be considered a separate and distinct jurisdiction or municipality from the County for purposes of the Suffolk County Civil Service Rules. In a letter dated June 29, 2010, Schneider denied the petitioner's request to rescind that determination. The petitioner then commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

The agency determination under review was not made after a quasi-judicial evidentiary hearing. In this circumstance, "courts examine whether the action taken by the agency has a rational basis and will overturn that action only where it is taken without sound basis in reason or regard to the facts, or where it is arbitrary and capricious"...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Youngewirth v. Town of Ramapo Town Bd.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 8, 2017
    ...Landfill Sys., 69 N.Y.2d 355, 363, 514 N.Y.S.2d 689, 507 N.E.2d 282 ; see Matter of Suffolk County Assn. of Mun. Empls., Inc. v. Levy, 133 A.D.3d 676, 677, 20 N.Y.S.3d 114 ; Matter of Gracie Point Community Council v. New York State Dept. of Envtl. Conservation, 92 A.D.3d 123, 128, 936 N.Y.......
  • Glyka Trans, LLC v. City of N.Y.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 2, 2018
    ...v. State of New York, 4 N.Y.3d 175, 184, 791 N.Y.S.2d 507, 824 N.E.2d 947 ; Matter of Suffolk County Assn. of Mun. Empls., Inc. v. Levy, 133 A.D.3d 676, 677, 20 N.Y.S.3d 114 ; Clayton v. New York City Taxi & Limousine Commn., 117 A.D.3d 602, 602–603, 986 N.Y.S.2d 117 ; Matter of Gonzalez v.......
  • Shapiro v. Planning Bd. of the Town of Ramapo
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 8, 2017
    ...Landfill Sys., 69 N.Y.2d 355, 363, 514 N.Y.S.2d 689, 507 N.E.2d 282 ; see Matter of Suffolk County Assn. of Mun. Empls., Inc. v. Levy, 133 A.D.3d 676, 677, 20 N.Y.S.3d 114 ). This is true even where the court would have reached a different result (see Matter of Terrace Ct., LLC v. New York ......
  • Wilson v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Hous. Preservation & Dev.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 21, 2016
    ...erred in annulling the HPD's determination (see 28 RCNY 3–02[i]; see also Matter of Suffolk County Assn. of Mun. Empls., Inc. v. Levy, 133 A.D.3d 676, 677, 20 N.Y.S.3d 114 ; Matter of Jennings v. Commissioner, N.Y.S. Dept. of Social Servs., 71 A.D.3d 98, 109–110, 893 N.Y.S.2d 103 ).The inte......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT