Sullivan v. Mt. Carmel Cemetery Ass'n
Citation | 155 N.E. 580,244 N.Y. 294 |
Parties | SULLIVAN v. MT. CARMEL CEMETERY ASS'N. |
Decision Date | 23 February 1927 |
Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Action by Hannah Sullivan, as receiver of the estate of Timothy D. Sullivan, against the Mt. Carmel Cemetery Association. Order of the Appellate Division, Second Department (217 App. Div. 309, 216 N. Y. S. 576), affirming an order for the Special Term, which denied a motion for judgment on the pleadings, and plaintiff appeals by permission of the Appellate Division (218 App. Div. 737, 218 N. Y. S. 914), which certified a question.
Order affirmed, and question certified answered.
Appeal from Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second department.
Abraham Benedict, Gustavus A. Rogers and Edith H. Kunen, all of New York City, for appellant.
Clinton T. Roe, of New Yrok City, for respondent.
The plaintiff is the holder of the following certificate of indebtedenss issued by the Mt. Carmel Cemetery Association on the 16th day of October, 1918:
‘Number 393
‘Incorporated under the laws of the state of New York.
‘This is to certify that the Mt. Carmel Cemetery Association, a corporation duly organized under and by virtue of the laws of the state of New York, is indebted to Hannah Sullivan, as receiver of the estate of Timothy D. Sullivan, deceased, or assigns, in the sum of two hundred thousand 00/000 dollars, for value received, which sum the said Mt. Carmel Cemetery Association hereby promises to pay on the first Monday in June, in the year nineteen hundred and twenty-five, at its office in the city of New York, on the presentation and surrender of this certificate.
‘The said Mt. Carmel Cemetery Association may apply as much more than one-half, or fifty per cent. of the proceeds of the sale and use of its lots and plots to the payment of its certificates of indebtedness as it may deem advisable and proper after the payment of the incidental expenses and liabilities of the said Mt. Carmel Cemetery Association, and the amount necessary for the preservation, improvement and embellishment of the cemetery grounds and the avenues and roads leading thereto.
‘This certificate of indebtedness is transferable only on the books of the Mt. Carmel Cemetery Association in person or by attorney on surrender of this certificate.
‘This certificate shall not become obligatory until it shall have been authenticated by the signature of the registrar selected by the Mt. Carmel Cemetery Association.
‘It witness whereof, the said Mt. Carmel Cemetery Association has caused this certificate of indebtedness to be signed by its president and its secretary, and its corporate seal to be hereto affixed at the city of New York on this 16th day of October A. D. 1918.
‘Mt. Carmel Cemetery Association.
‘[Corporate Seal.]
‘By Ben Blumenthal President.
‘Maurice B. Blumenthal, Secretary.’
On June 15, 1925, the due date, only $69,500 had been paid, and there was due $130,500 for which this plaintiff has brought an action at law. There is included in the complaint a second cause of action upon another like certificate, but, for the purposes of this opinion, only one need be mentioned.
The defendant answered, setting up that the certificates held by the plaintiff represented part of land purchase certificates, and are for the unpaid balance of the purchase price of land acquired and to be used for cemetery purposes, that, pursuant to the laws and statutes of the state of New York, the proceeds received from the sale of cemetery lots are to be applied to the payment and reduction of such certificates, and that the defendant was unathorized by law to obligate itself to pay said amounts at a fixed date.
The plaintiff having moved for judgment on the pleadings, the motion was denied, and the order of the Special Term has been affirmed by the Appellate Division. This not being a final order, the Appellate Division granted leave to appeal to this court, certifying the following question: ‘Is the plaintiff entitled to judgment in her favor upon the pleadings?’ We may put this question in another form. Can the plaintiff maintain an action at law on this certificate, obtain a money judgment, and issue execution to collect it; or must she resort to an action in equity for an accounting and for the pro rata application of moneys received from the sale of lots to her certificates?
[1] After a review of all our statutes applicable to cemetery corporations, I am of the opinion that an action in equity for an accounting and its incidental reliefs is the only remedy. Chapter 133 of the Laws of 1847 is the first act of the Legislature which we need refer to. It provided for the incorporation of cemetery associations, and gave them power to purchase land to be used exclusively for the burial of the dead, not to exceed 200 acres. Authority was also given to hold personal property not exceeding $5,000. Section 7 provided:
Section 10 reads:
‘The cemetery lands and property of any association, formed pursuant to this act, shall be exempt from all public taxes, rates, and assessments; and shall not be liable to be sold on execution, or be applied in payment of debts, due from any individual proprietors.’
This was followed by chapter 122 of the Laws of 1853, by adding to the Act of 1847 the following section:
Then came chapter 163 of the Laws of 1860, giving authority to the cemetery associations to issue certificates of indebtedness. This was also by amendment of the act of 1847. ‘It shall be lawful,’ says section 1, ‘for the trustees * * * to fund any outstanding indebtedness, for lands purchased for cemetery purposes, or for moneys actually expended in preserving, improving and embellishing the cemetery grounds, and to provide for the payment of such funded debt, in the manner hereinafter provided.’
Then follows:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Christgau v. Woodlawn Cemetery Ass'n
...of a remedy.’ The obligations of a cemetery association may be enforced by an appropriate remedy. Sullivan v. Mount Carmel Cemetery Ass'n, 244 N.Y. 294, 155 N.E. 580. It is sufficient now to adjudicate the liability. Diocese of St. Paul v. City of St. Paul, 138 Minn. 67, 163 N.W. 978. The s......
-
Christgau v. Woodlawn Cemetery Ass'n, Winona
... ... 167, 142 A. 78. The case of Donnelly v. Boston Catholic Cemetery Assn., 146 Mass. 163, 15 N.E. 505, 507, was stronger in its facts in favor of the claim that the ... Sullivan v. Mount Carmel Cemetery Ass'n, 244 N.Y. 294, 155 N.E. 580. It is sufficient now to adjudicate the ... ...
-
Christgau v. Woodlawn Cemetery Ass'n, Winona
...of a remedy.’ The obligations of a cemetery association may be enforced by an appropriate remedy. Sullivan v. Mount Carmel Cemetery Ass'n, 244 N.Y. 294, 155 N.E. 580. It is sufficient now to adjudicate the liability. Diocese of St. Paul v. City of St. Paul, 138 Minn. 67, 163 N.W. 978. The s......
- Filitti v. Lerode Homes Corp.