Sullivan v. Sisters of St. Francis of Tex.

Decision Date31 December 1963
Docket NumberNo. 14155,14155
PartiesRichard SULLIVAN et al., Appellants, v. SISTERS OF ST. FRANCIS OF TEXAS, d/b/a Refugio County Hospital, Appellee.
CourtTexas Court of Appeals

Edwards & De Anda, Corpus Christi, Frederic Johnson, Sinton, for appellants.

K. D. Hall, Refugio, Lewright, Dyer & Redford, Corpus Christi, for appellee.

MURRAY, Chief Justice.

This suit was instituted by Richard Sullivan, individually and as personal representative and next of kin of his minor son, Daniel Joseph Sullivan, deceased, hereinafter referred to as Danny, and as manager of the community estate existing between himself and his wefe, Cassandra Sullivan, against Sisters of St. Francis of Texas, d/b/a Refugio County Hospital, South-western Drug Corporation and Eli Lilly & Company, seeking to recover damages growing out of the injury and death suffered by Danny, alleged to have been caused by the negligent administration of a dose of ipecac by employees of the Hospital. The trial court severed the causes of action against Southwestern Drug Corporation and Eli Lilly & Company, and granted the Hospital's motion for a summary judgment, from which judgment the plaintiffs have prosecuted this appeal.

The motion for a summary judgment on behalf of the Hospital set up its immunity as a charitable institution. Appellants answered the motion for a summary judgment in effect admitting the charitable immunity of the Hospital, but alleging that there are certain recognized exceptions to the doctrine of charitable immunity, among which is that a charity may be held liable for administrative negligence in the performance of a non-delegable duty as distinguished from employee negligence. It was charged that the Hospital was guilty of administrative negligence in failing to employ a registered pharmacist, under the circumstances of this case, to administer its pharmacy or drug room, and that such negligence was a proximate cause of the death of Danny.

Appellants alleged 'that at all times pertinent to this law suit such Defendant failed to comply with the standards established by the Joint Commission on Accordation of Hospitals and of the American Hospital Association in regard to the operation of pharmacies and drug rooms; the storage, safeguarding, preparation, and dispensing of drugs; competency of department personnel; control of dangerous drugs; and medical staff committee on the formulation of drug policies.' And further alleged that 'These failures and each of them were negligence, a proximate cause of the death of Danny Sullivan, and an exception to the rule of Charitable Immunity.'

Appellants further alleged 'that such Defendant was guilty of administrative negligence in failing to provide adequate personnel for the operation of the hospital's pharmacy or drug room facilities and the distribution of drugs; and in failing to formulate and carry out a proper and adequate policy, with the necessary and proper rules and regulations, governing the operation of the hospital's pharmacy or drug room and the dispensing of drugs from the pharmacy or drug room. These failures and each of them, were negligence, a proximate cause of the death of Danny Sullivan, and an exception to the rule of Charitable Immunity.'

Appellants stipulated that appellee is a charitable institution, and that they would have no cause of action unless it was based upon one of the well-recognized exceptions to the rule of charitable immunity.

Appellee filed no reply to this answer. Neither the motion nor the answer was verified. No supporting affidavits were filed either by appellants or appellee. The only support for the motion for summary judgment was the unverified pleadings, the depositions of Sister Mary Severine and Sister Mary Judith, and the Charter of the Hospital. The Charter shows that the Hospital is a charitable institution and that its incorporators are Mary Sebastian Waurniak, Mary Chrysantha Bentley, and Mary Judith McCoy.

From the depositions of the two sisters, it is shown that at about 2:30 in the afternoon on December 31, 1961, Danny Sullivan was taken to the Hospital by his grandmother, Mrs. Rita Sneed. He had apparently taken some tablets of an unknown type. Danny was taken into the emergency room of the Hospital where he was treated by Dr. Anderson. Upon orders from the doctor a dose of 'ipecac' was given to Danny by Sister Mary Severine. This dose of 'ipecac' was two teaspoons. A second dose, which the Sister attempted to administer, was the same size. The 'ipecac' in question was in the emergency room and was marked 'Syrup of Ipecac' although it may have been 'fluid extract of ipecac.' It is contended that as a result of his taking such 'ipecac' Danny Sullivan died. A second child to whom some of the same 'ipecac' was administered died in the hospital during the same week.

In August or September, 1961, the hospital purchased a pint bottle of 'Ipecac'--'Fluid Extract.' The pint bottle of 'Ipecac' went to the drug room, where it was broken down into smaller bottles as it was needed in the emergency room. This was the only 'Ipecac' in the drug room at the time.

Sister Mary Judith was not a registered pharmacist, she had no training in pharmacy other than that taken during her formal nurse's training...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Watkins v. Southcrest Baptist Church, A-10633
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • January 5, 1966
    ...of the hospital to exercise due care in the selection of its physicians, nurses and attendants. Similarly, in Sullivan v. City Sisters of St. Francis of Texas, 374 S.W.2d 294 (Tex.Civ.App.1963, no writ hist.), it was held that the charitable immunity doctrine does not protect a hospital fro......
  • Gravis v. Physicians and Surgeons Hospital of Alice, 14564
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • April 5, 1967
    .... In support of this contention, appellants cite Art. 4542a, Vernon's Ann.Civ.St., and the case of Sullivan v. Sisters of St. Francis of Texas, Tex.Civ,.app., 374 S.W.2d 294, no writ. Such statute relates to pharmacies and the operation thereof. We find no evidence in the record that the ap......
  • Toungate v. Bastrop Independent School Dist.
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • November 25, 1992
    ...730 S.W.2d 843, 845 (Tex.App.--Dallas 1987, writ ref'd n.r.e.) (issue of reasonableness is inherently a fact issue); Sullivan v. Sisters of St. Francis, 374 S.W.2d 294, 297 (Tex.Civ.App.--San Antonio 1963, no writ) (questions of negligence and proximate cause are usually fact issues). We th......
  • Smith v. Muckleroy Enterprises, 917
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • April 29, 1976
    ...Mabrey Foundry and Machine Co. v. Howard Motor Co., 422 S.W.2d 238 (Tex.Civ.App.--Beaumont 1967, n.w.h.); Sullivan v. Sisters of St. Frances of Texas, 374 S.W.2d 294 (Tex.Civ.App.--San Antonio 1963, n.w.h.); Fuller v. Southwestern Greyhound Lines, Inc., 331 S.W.2d 455 (Tex.Civ.App.--Austin ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT