Sullivan v. State

• Decision Date: 16 October 1939
• Docket Number: 33773
• Citation: 186 Miss. 423,191 So. 413
• Court: Mississippi Supreme Court
• Parties: SULLIVAN v. STATE

191 So. 413

186 Miss. 423

SULLIVAN v. STATE

No. 33773

Supreme Court of Mississippi, Division B

October 16, 1939

APPEAL from the circuit court of Simpson county HON. EDGAR M. LANE Judge.

Homer Sullivan was convicted of murder, and he appeals. Affirmed.

Affirmed.

Edwards & Edwards, of Mendenhall, for appellant.

The purported dying declaration was inadmissible in evidence in this case for the reason said declaration was not made at a time when the declarant had a sincere and settled belief of his impending dissolution. He lived 8 days after said declaration was made and the state failed to show beyond a reasonable doubt that said declaration was made with a sincere and settled belief on the part of the deceased of his impending dissolution and it failed to show beyond a reasonable doubt that the deceased had lost all hope of recovery, however slight--the burden being on the state to show this beyond a reasonable doubt.

Hathorn v. State, 138 Miss. 11, 102 So. 771; Wilkinson v State, 108 So. 711, 143 Miss. 324; Haney v State, 129 Miss. 486, 92 So. 627; McNeal v. State, 115 Miss. 678, 76 So. 625; Lea v. State, 103 So. 368, 138 Miss. 761; Wade v. State, 147 Miss. 479, 112 So. 677; Bell v. State, 17 So. 232, 72 Miss. 507.

The court erred in admitting over the objection of the defendant each and every word of the purported dying declaration introduced in evidence on the trial of this cause.

Lipscomb v. State, 23 So. 210, 75 Miss. 559.

The purported dying declaration was incompetent, inadmissible and was not qualified according to law.

The deceased at the time of the declaration must have had a fixed and settled belief of his impending dissolution and must have lost all hope of recovery, however slight. The burden of proof to show this was upon the state before the declaration was admissible.

Haney v. State, 129 Miss. 486, 92 So. 627; Hawthorn v. State, 138 Miss. 11, 102 So. 771; McNeal v. State, 115 Miss. 678, 76 So. 625; Lea v. State, 103 So. 368, 138 Miss. 761; Dean v. State, 160 So. 584.

W. D. Conn, Jr., Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

There was no specific objection that the dying declaration which was offered was not qualified to show that the declarant was conscious of immediate and impending dissolution.

Boatwright v. State, 143 Miss. 676, 109 So. 710; Jackson v. State, 163 Miss. 235, 140 So. 683; Wampold v. State, 170 Miss. 732, 155 So. 350.

That a declarant was conscious of impending dissolution may be shown by attending circumstances.

McDaniel v. State, 16 Miss. (8 S. & M.) 401, 47 Am. Dec. 93; Lewis v. State, 9 S. & M. 115; House v. State, 94 Miss. 107, 48 So. 3; Wilcher v. State, 99 Miss. 374, 54 So. 766; Elie v. State, 128 Miss. 715, 91 So. 417; Dean v. State 173 Miss. 254, 160 So. 584.

The trial judge's ruling that the dying declaration was competent will not be set aside by this court unless it appears that such holding is contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence.

Wade v. State, 147 Miss. 479, 112 So. 677; Scott v. State, 166 Miss. 6, 148 So. 239.

Any errors in admitting the dying declaration identifying the declarant's assailant will be rendered harmless, if the defendant testifies and admits that he was such assailant.

Donahue v. State, 142 Miss. 20, 107 So. 15.

There was no specific objection that the dying declaration was not restricted to the res gestae.

Jackson v. State, 163 Miss. 235, 140 So. 683.

Evidence of what declarant said in addition to these matters relating to the res gestae were admissible in determining, not only the mental condition of the declarant at the time the declaration was made, but also his consciousness of immediate and impending dissolution.

Dean v. State, 173 Miss. 254, 160 So. 584.

OPINION

Ethridge, P. J.

At the March term, 1939, of the Circuit Court of Simpson county, Homer Sullivan was indicted for the murder of one, Tommie Tuggle, was placed on trial, and sentenced to serve a term of twelve years in the state penitentiary. From that sentence an appeal was taken to this Court.

The difficulty, in connection with which Tuggle received the wounds which subsequently resulted in his death, occurred in the fall of 1938, and he died about the middle of February, 1939. He was stabbed in the chest nine times, one stab penetrating his lungs. A physician who was called to attend him found the wounds as described, and the patient in a condition of profound shock; and stated that the wound was the cause of his death. We quote his language in regard thereto: "Well, in general English I call it abscess and breaking down of the lung tissue, and pus--he would spit that up." He further testified that the deceased had pus in his lungs for some time prior to his death, the presence of which caused chills sometimes three or four times a day. The deceased was treated at the hospital, and then returned to his home, and at times was up and about. About a week before his death he was returned to the hospital. On that day he became unconscious--or rather, unable to speak, and unconscious a portion of the time. On Saturday, just prior to his return to the hospital, he made a statement in regard to his condition and the cause of his death; and in a few hours thereafter became unable to speak.

The dying declaration made at that time was testified to by the father and mother of the deceased, and also by his wife, the statements being substantially alike, although differing in detail to some extent. The father, George Tuggle, testified, the first statement was made on the night of the 16th of September, on the preliminary examination by the court as to the admissibility of the dying declaration. But all statements except the one made on the Saturday that he was last returned to the hospital, and about one week before he died, were excluded; and the statement made on that day, testified to by the father, mother and wife, was admitted. On the preliminary inquiry the court went fully into all of the testimony bearing on his condition, and all of the statements he made prior to this time, for the purpose of ascertaining the condition of decedent's mind in regard to his conviction that he was about to die, the inquiry taking a wide range. The statement admitted by the court is as follows:

"Now, Mr. Tuggle, you state to the court there in the absence of the jury just exactly what was said there around 9 o'clock that Saturday before he was carried to the hospital the same afternoon?"

Counsel for defendant: "We object to all that even in the absence of the jury."

No ruling.

"Q. Was he in or out of bed at that time? A. In bed.

"Q. Now, state to the jury just what he said? A. He was in a dying condition right then and people thought he couldn't live through the day.

"Q. Was he rational, knew what he was talking about? A. Yes, sir.

"Q. Go ahead and tell exactly what he said? A. He said, 'Mamma, I have got to die, you have done all you could for me but I have got to go.' He said, 'I am killed, you all can't help it.' He said, 'Make the best of it you can.' He said, 'God is calling me, I'm going home, home, sweet home, where there ain't no murderers there.' He said, 'Mamma, when are you coming?' And she couldn't answer she was crying so and I said, 'It won't be long with us until we will be there.' He said, 'Homer killed me for nothing because I wouldn't do the wrong thing.' But he said he was proud he didn't.

"Q. Did he say what the wrong thing was? A. Yes, sir.

"Q. What? A. Because he wouldn't swear a lie for him.

"Q. Did he say how he was killed? A. Yes, sir, killed him with a knife, stabbed him to death.

"Q. Did he say anything further? A. I think not, I don't remember. He talked a little along, some of the neighbors came in. A little later Van came and run after some people to come there and they thought he would die before then, and they got Dr. Magee...