Sullivant v. Americana Homes, Inc.

Decision Date27 May 1980
Citation605 S.W.2d 246
PartiesRobert B. SULLIVANT and Willola V. Sullivant, Husband and Wife, Appellants, v. AMERICANA HOMES, INC., a corporation; Melba Investors Southwest, Inc., a corporation; the Hildebrand Company, a corporation, Appellees.
CourtTennessee Court of Appeals

James F. Schaeffer, Memphis, for appellants.

R. Grattan Brown, Jr. and William Thomas Newton, Memphis, for appellee, Americana Homes, Inc.

J. Murray Milliken and Wesley D. Turner, Nashville, for appellee, Melba Investors Southwest, Inc.

Joseph M. Cook, Memphis, for appellee, Hildebrand Co.

NEARN, Judge.

This case arises out of the purchase of a condominium by the Sullivants.

All of the defendants moved the Trial Court, under Rule 12.02(6) T.R.C.P., to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The Trial Judge granted the motions without specifying his reasons. The plaintiffs appeal.

No affidavits were filed. The complaint must stand on its own as there is nothing else for us to consider.

We deem it appropriate to here copy the complaint which is in two counts and avers:

"Come now plaintiffs and for cause of action against the defendants would allege as follows:

JURISDICTION & VENUE

"1. Plaintiffs are each residents of Shelby County, Tennessee.

"2. Defendant Americana Homes, Inc., is a corporation licensed and authorized to transact business in the State of Tennessee and all times pertinent herein was so engaged (in) the transaction of business in Shelby County, Tennessee.

"3. Defendant Melba Investors Southwest, Inc., is a corporation licensed and authorized to transact business in the State of Tennessee and at all times pertinent was so engaged in the transaction of business in Shelby County, Tennessee.

"4. Defendant The Hildebrand Company is a corporation licensed and authorized to transact business in the State of Tennessee and at all times pertinent was so engaged in the transaction of business in Shelby County, Tennessee.

"5. Plaintiffs' cause of action against the defendants arises in tort and contract for misrepresentation and deceit by defendants in the sale of real property to plaintiffs in Shelby County, Tennessee.

FACTS

"6. Defendant Melba Investors Southwest, Inc. on or before September 1, 1977 were the owners of record of a condominium development commonly known as " Bavarian Village", including unit 74 of said complex, all of which was located in Shelby County, Tennessee.

"7. At all times herein pertinent, defendant Americana Homes, Inc., served as the agent of Melba Investors Southwest, Inc., in the management and maintenance of the Bavarian Village Development.

"8. At all times herein pertinent, defendant The Hildebrand Company was serving as the real estate agent to procure the sale of various condominiums in the Bavarian Village complex.

"9. Prior to September 1, 1977, plaintiffs entered into a contract of sale to purchase unit 74 of the development known as "Bavarian Village" in Germantown, Shelby County, Tennessee.

"10. Prior to plaintiffs entering into the contract of sale and prior to closing of the sale, defendants knew, or within the exercise of reasonable care should have known, that there existed a serious seepage or drainage problem in the development including unit 74.

"11. Notwithstanding such knowledge, defendants failed to disclose to plaintiffs and concealed from them the information that such a problem existed in the condominium development and in unit 74.

"12. In the late fall of 1977, plaintiffs first noticed that the condominium unit had serious defects in that excessive moisture was present on the floors in various parts of the condominium unit.

"13. Pursuant to a one-year warranty, plaintiffs gave defendants notice of the problem and defendants caused inquiry to be made into the source of such problem.

"14. Some action was taken by defendants. Notwithstanding such action, the problem recurred in the Spring, 1978 and apparently is unresolved.

"15. Plaintiffs have attempted to cooperate with defendants in resolving the problem, have incurred some expenses for installation of an electrostatic unit to alleviate the unhealthy effect of the seepage problem and have suffered other losses which will be set forth hereinafter.

WRONGS COMPLAINED OF

"16. Defendant Americana Homes, Inc. and The Hildebrand Company have been guilty of the following wrongs, all of which proximately which have resulted in damages to plaintiffs:

"A. In knowingly or negligently representing to plaintiffs that the condominium unit was fit for habitation;

"B. In knowingly or negligently failing to disclose to plaintiffs the fact that a seepage or drainage problem existed in the condominium unit prior to the time of the sale.

"17. Defendant Melba Investors Southwest, Inc. is likewise liable to plaintiffs for the aforedescribed wrongs committed by their agents under the doctrine of agency. Melba Investors Southwest, Inc. is additionally liable to plaintiffs for damages sustained by plaintiffs as a proximate result of the negligent failure of defendant Melba Investors Southwest, Inc. in construction of the condominium units, said negligence resulting in the seepage or drainage problem herein referred to.

INJURIES & DAMAGES

"18. As a direct and proximate result of the aforedescribed wrongs committed by defendants herein, plaintiffs have been caused to suffer and incur the following damages:

"A. Some expenses by plaintiff to alleviate the seriousness of the condition, including the purchase of an electrostatic unit;

"B. Diminished value in the property as it actually exists with the aforedescribed defect is of considerably less value than it would be had no such problem existed.

RELIEF SOUGHT

"WHEREFORE, plaintiffs, Robert B. Sullivant and Willola V. Sullivant, sue the defendants herein, jointly and severally, for the sum of Thirty Thousand Dollars ($30,000) damages and respectfully demand a trial by jury.

COUNT II

"Come now plaintiffs and reiterate each and every allegation or paragraphs 1 through 18, the same as if hereby specifically set forth and realleged and for further cause of action would show as follows:

"19. Plaintiff, Willola Sullivant, has suffered throughout her life intermitently (sic) from a lung condition known as Asthma.

"20. Prior to September 1, 1977, plaintiff, Willola Sullivant, had been relatively symptom free of this lung condition and was in reasonably good health.

"21. From and since September 1, 1977, plaintiff has been caused to suffer more and more frequent attacks of asthma, causing her extreme suffering and anguish.

"22. In approximately January, 1978, plaintiffs were first advised and first learned that the exacerbation of asthamatic (sic) condition was in all probability due to the excessive moisture caused by the seepage or drainage problem hereinabove referred to.

"23. Despite efforts to minimize the harmful effects of the seepage or drainage problem, plaintiff has continued to suffer recurrent acts (sic) of asthma.

"24. Plaintiff, Willola Sullivant, alleges that the wrongs committed by defendants herein as set forth above consitute (sic) a proximate cause of the recurrent attacks of asthma.

"25. As a direct and proximate result of the wrongs hereinabove referred to, plaintiff has been caused to suffer and incur the following damages:

"A. Severe, frequent attacks of asthma;

"B. Severe...

To continue reading

Request your trial
23 cases
  • Hinkle v. Kindred Hosp.
    • United States
    • Tennessee Court of Appeals
    • August 31, 2012
    ...in support of his claim that would entitle him to relief. Willis v. Dept. of Corrections, 113 S.W.3d at 710; Sullivant v. Americana Homes, 605 S.W.2d 246 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1980). Such motions are not favored, and are rarely granted in light of the liberal pleading standards in the Tennessee R......
  • Hamblen v. Davidson
    • United States
    • Tennessee Court of Appeals
    • November 8, 2000
    ...31, 1996, and that recovery for personal injuries in the complaint filed on October 15, 1998 is barred. In Sullivant v. Americana Homes, Inc., 605 S.W.2d 246 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1980), we addressed a similar case involving the discovery rule in the context of a motion to dismiss. The plaintiff ......
  • Strategic Cap. Resou. v. Dylan Tire Indus.
    • United States
    • Tennessee Court of Appeals
    • July 9, 2002
    ...be construed so as to do substantial justice. See Ezell v. Graves, 807 S.W.2d 700 (Tenn.Ct.App.1990); cf. Sullivant v. Americana Homes, Inc., 605 S.W.2d 246 (Tenn.Ct.App.1980). In City State Bank v. Dean Witter Reynolds, 948 S.W.2d 729 (Tenn.Ct.App.1996), the court found the complaint suffi......
  • Wicks v. Vanderbilt University, No. M2006-00613-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. App. 3/21/2007)
    • United States
    • Tennessee Court of Appeals
    • March 21, 2007
    ...of fact therein as true. Id.; see also Lackey v. Carson, 886 S.W.2d 232, 232 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994) (citing Sullivant v. Americana Homes, Inc., 605 S.W.2d 246, 249 (Tenn.App.1980)). Any such dismissal by the trial court, like a dismissal under Rule 12 of the Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedur......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT