Sumner v. Adel Banking Co., 33688

Decision Date06 July 1978
Docket NumberNo. 33688,33688
PartiesSUMNER v. ADEL BANKING COMPANY.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

Elsie Higgs Griner, Nashville, J. Laddie Boatright, Hazlehurst, for appellant.

Griffis & Thomas, Tom W. Thomas, Adel, Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen., for appellee.

NICHOLS, Chief Justice.

The bank brought suit against Sumner seeking, in Count 1, a money judgment for principal, interest and attorney fees and, in Count 2, a writ of possession pursuant to Code Ann. § 67-701 et seq. as to certain farming equipment in which it claimed a security interest.

An immediate writ of possession was issued pursuant to Code Ann. § 67-709. The equipment was levied upon by the sheriff pursuant to Code Ann. §§ 67-707 and 67-714. Sumner filed defensive pleadings pursuant to Code Ann. § 67-715 and motions pursuant to Code Ann. § 67-716. The trial court denied all grounds of the motions, some of which asserted denials of federal and state rights to due process and equal protection. Sumner appeals.

Code Ann. § 67-706 provides, in relevant part, that "Any judgment by the court shall be appealable pursuant to Code Title 6 or any other applicable law." Accordingly, the appealability of the order in the present case must be determined by the principles stated in Code Ann. §§ 6-701 and 81A-154(b).

The order sought to be appealed is not "final" within the meaning of Code Ann. § 6-701(a)1 because the case still is pending in the trial court. Neither did the trial court act pursuant to Code Ann. § 81A-154(b).

The trial court has not issued a certificate pursuant to Code Ann. § 6-701(a) 2(A) and no application has been made to this court pursuant to Code Ann. § 6-701(a)2(B) for interlocutory appeal. The order is not one of those enumerated under Code Ann. § 6-701(a)3. Hence, the order sought to be appealed is not properly before this court on appeal.

The cases of Coppage v. Mellon Bank, 142 Ga.App. 12, 234 S.E.2d 824 (1977) and First Nat. Bank of Commerce v. Baker, 142 Ga.App. 870, 237 S.E.2d 233 (1977) incorrectly held that Code Ann. § 67-706 provides that any judgment entered under Code Ann. Ch. 67-7 shall be appealable. Those cases will not be followed.

The order as to which an appeal was sought in the present case was interlocutory and was not appealable except in accordance with Code Ann. § 6-701(a)2.

Appeal dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • O'Kelly v. International Business Machines Corp., 61739
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • May 12, 1981
    ...overruled, along with Coppage v. Mellon Bank, 142 Ga.App. 12, 234 S.E.2d 824, by the holding of the Supreme Court in Sumner v. Adel Banking Co., 241 Ga. 563, 246 S.E.2d 680, that the Coppage and the First Nat. Bank cases "incorrectly held that Code Ann. § 67-706 provides that any judgment e......
  • Chapman v. Bank of Cumming, 57498
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • July 3, 1979
    ...pp. 1705, 1707); First Nat. Bank v. Baker, 142 Ga.App. 870, 871(2), 237 S.E.2d 233, overruled on other grounds in Sumner v. Adel Banking Co., 241 Ga. 563, 246 S.E.2d 680. 2. "The question of the sufficiency of the description in a recorded instrument to impart constructive notice is for the......
  • Cavender v. First Nat. Bank of Brunswick, s. 69295
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • March 5, 1985
    ...review the instant [appeals are] premature. Foskey v. Bank of Alapaha, 147 Ga.App. 541 (249 SE2d 346) [(1978)]; Sumner v. Adel Banking Co., 241 Ga. 563 (246 SE2d 680) [(1978)]." Id., 150 Ga.App. at 474, 258 S.E.2d 227. In this case, appellant filed a demand for jury trial. Therefore, after ......
  • Smalls v. Harrison
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • June 26, 1979
    ...of immediate review the instant appeal is premature. Foskey v. Bank of Alapaha, 147 Ga.App. 541, 249 S.E.2d 346; Sumner v. Adel Banking Co., 241 Ga. 563, 246 S.E.2d 680. Since there appears to be a general misconception as to Code Ann. § 67-705, for the benefit of the bench and bar we reite......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT