Suntrust Bank v. Bickerstaff
Decision Date | 06 March 2019 |
Docket Number | A18A1519 |
Citation | 824 S.E.2d 717,349 Ga.App. 794 |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Parties | SUNTRUST BANK v. BICKERSTAFF. |
Rogers & Hardin, Richard H. Sinkfield, Michael L. Eber, Katherine L. D'Ambrosio, Atlanta; Troutman Sanders, Pete Robinson, William N. Withrow, Jr., Jaime L. Theriot, Lindsey B. Mann, Atlanta, for appellant.
Bondurant Mixson & Elmore, Michael B. Terry, Frank M. Lowrey IV, Steven J. Rosenwasser, Jason J. Carter, Joshua F. Thorpe, Atlanta; C. Ronald Ellington ; The Finley Firm, J. Benjamin Finley, MaryBeth V. Gibson, M. Kathryn Rogers, Atlanta, for appellee.
In 2010, Jeff Bickerstaff, Jr.,1 a customer of SunTrust Bank ("SunTrust"), filed a complaint against SunTrust on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated asserting that SunTrust's overdraft fees constitute unlawful interest charges and raising claims for violation of Georgia's civil and criminal usury laws ( OCGA §§ 7-4-2 and 7-4-18, respectively), money had and received, and conversion. This is the third appearance of this case before this Court. In the instant appeal, SunTrust challenges the Superior Court of Fulton County's order holding SunTrust's class-action litigation waiver unconscionable and granting Bickerstaff's motion for class certification, pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-23. SunTrust argues that the trial court erred in (1) finding the class-action waiver unconscionable, and (2) granting class certification. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
Like many banking institutions, SunTrust provides an automated overdraft program that allows an account holder's ATM or debit card transaction to be approved even if the approved amount exceeds the account holder's available balance. In other words, the customer has insufficient funds to cover the transaction and SunTrust advances the customer the necessary funds to cover the transaction, but, in return, charges the customer a flat fee per overdraft transaction. During the relevant time period, SunTrust charged a flat overdraft fee of $32 or $36 per overdraft transaction. In the complaint, Bickerstaff alleged that, on multiple occasions, SunTrust "advance[d] money to Plaintiff in amounts less than $3,000 and collected Overdraft Fees from Plaintiff in connection with each such advance." He maintained that SunTrust's overdraft fees in fact constitute interest charged by SunTrust for the use of the money SunTrust advanced/loaned account holders to cover overdrafts on their accounts, and that the rate of interest grossly exceeded the rate allowed under Georgia's usury laws.
The record reveals that, in 2009, when Bickerstaff opened his account with SunTrust, he, like all SunTrust customers, signed a document acknowledging receipt of SunTrust's Rules and Regulations for Deposit Accounts—an approximately 40-page, single-spaced, fine-print booklet ("the Rules and Regulations")—and agreeing to be bound by the Rules and Regulations. In relevant part, in an introductory section preceding the table of contents, the Rules and Regulations included a provision that "[a] determination that any part of this agreement is invalid or unenforceable will not affect the remainder of this agreement." On page 22 of the booklet, the Rules and Regulations included a mandatory arbitration provision, which provided as follows:
Additionally, on page 24, the Rules and Regulations contained a jury trial waiver provision, which provided as follows:
(Emphasis supplied.) The final sentence of the above paragraph is at issue in this case and is hereinafter referred to as the "class-action waiver."
After Bickerstaff filed the underlying complaint, SunTrust revised its Rules and Regulations and provided customers with the ability to opt out of arbitration. SunTrust moved to compel arbitration in the underlying case, which the trial court denied, finding that Bickerstaff effectively exercised his right to opt out of arbitration by filing the instant complaint.2
Subsequently, SunTrust entered into an agreed upon stipulation related to class certification, stipulating to the following:
In 2013, Bickerstaff moved for class certification, pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-23. SunTrust opposed class certification, arguing, in relevant part, that (1) the class-action waiver in the Rules and Regulations precluded certification; (2) Bickerstaff could not opt out of the arbitration agreement on behalf of the class; and (3) Bickerstaff could not satisfy the numerosity, commonality, typicality, and adequacy of representation requirements for class certification under OCGA § 9-11-23. In reply, Bickerstaff asserted, among other arguments, that the class-action waiver was unconscionable, and, alternatively, was unenforceable as a matter of law because it was a non-severable part of the unenforceable jury trial waiver.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
San Miguel Produce, Inc. v. L.G. Herndon Jr. Farms, Inc.
...of contract construction and enforceability are generally questions of law for a court to resolve ...." SunTrust Bank v. Bickerstaff, 349 Ga.App. 794, 824 S.E.2d 717, 722 (2019) (quoting Precision Planning, Inc. v. Richmark Cmties., Inc., 298 Ga.App. 78, 679 S.E.2d 43, 45 (2009) ). Herndon ......
-
Underwood v. Colony Bank
...must address Colony's contention that the forbearance agreement itself is not an enforceable contract. See SunTrust Bank v. Bickerstaff , 349 Ga. App. 794, 799, 824 S.E.2d 717 (2019) (contract construction and enforceability are questions of law for the court). We conclude that the forbeara......
-
Underwood v. Colony Bank
... ... that the forbearance agreement itself is not an enforceable ... contract. See SunTrust Bank v. Bickerstaff , 349 ... Ga.App. 794, 799 (824 S.E.2d 717) (2019) (contract ... construction and enforceability are questions of law ... ...
-
City of Roswell v. Bible
...the trial court must determine that at least one ground included in OCGA § 9-11-23 (b) is satisfied. See SunTrust Bank v. Bickerstaff , 349 Ga. App. 794, 801 (2), 824 S.E.2d 717 (2019). Pertinent to this case, OCGA § 9-11-23 (b) (3) provides that a class action may be maintained if the tria......