Supreme Ruling of Fraternal Mystic Circle v. Sommers

Decision Date16 November 1914
Docket Number16705
CitationSupreme Ruling of Fraternal Mystic Circle v. Sommers, 66 So. 322, 108 Miss. 54 (Miss. 1914)
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
PartiesSUPREME RULING OF FRATERNAL MYSTIC CIRCLE v. SOMMERS

APPEAL from the circuit court of Washington county. HON. J. M CASHIN, Judge.

Suit by Margaret A. Sommers against the Supreme Ruling of the Fraternal Mystic Circle. From a judgment for plaintiff defendant appeals.

The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the court.

Reversed and remanded.

Cutrer & Johnston, for appellant.

Watson & Jayne, for appellee.

OPINION

COOK, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment by default, rendered by the circuit court of Washington county, upon a declaration filed by appellee against appellant, upon an alleged contract of insurance. The declaration avers that the "Supreme Ruling of the Fraternal Mystic Circle is a benefit society doing business in and having subordinate lodges in Washington county." A summons was issued on this declaration, which commanded the sheriff to summon the "Supreme Ruling of the Fraternal Mystic Circle, if to be found in your county," etc. The sheriff's return of the summons is as follows:

"Received this first day of November, 1911.

"THOS WORTHINGTON, Sheriff,

By S. P. AKIN, D. S.

"Executed the within process this first day of November, 1911, upon the defendant, the Supreme Ruling of the Fraternal Mystic Circle, in person, by handing Hy. Schawl a true copy thereof.

THOS. WORTHINGTON, Sheriff,

By GEORGE W. PHILLIPS, D. S."

There is nothing anywhere in the record to show what relation, if any,...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
7 cases
  • Hirsch Bros. & Co. v. R. E. Kennington Co
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • October 28, 1929
    ... ... v. R. E. KENNINGTON CO No. 28013 Supreme Court of Mississippi October 28, 1929 ... Supreme ... Mistic Circle v. Sommers, 108 Miss. 54, 66 So. 322; Wuchter ... the soundness of the ruling is doubted ... "4. But it is certain that a ... ...
  • Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis v. Wall
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • December 1, 1924
    ...and that fact must affirmatively appear from the record. Watkins Mch. Co. v. Cincinnati Rubber Co., 96 Miss. 610; Supreme Ruling F. M. C. v. Somers, 66 So. 322. recitation in a judgment by default to the effect "that the court found that the defendant had been served with a summons for the ......
  • Polhemus v. American Medical Ass'n, 2912.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • October 19, 1944
    ...and rightfully dismissed the complaint. Affirmed. 1 Watkins v. Hunt, 247 Mich. 237, 225 N.W. 554; Supreme Ruling of Fraternal Circle v. Sommers, 108 Miss. 54, 66 So. 322; Lake v. Texas News Co., D.C., 51 F.2d 862. 2 Newburyport Water Co. v. Newburyport, 193 U.S. 561, 24 S.Ct. 553, 48 L.Ed. ......
  • Campbell & Campbell v. Pickens Bank
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • March 10, 1924
    ...a compliance with which in that respect is mandatory and jurisdictional. Anderson Merc. Co. v. Cudahy Pack. Co., 90 So. 11; Mystic Circle v. Sommers, 108 Miss. 54; case, 96 Miss. 610. Also see Mitchell Furn. Company v. Selden Breck Cons. Co., (U. S. Sup.) 66 L.Ed. 201. In response to appell......
  • Get Started for Free