Sutherland Lumber-Southwest v. Comm'r Internal Rev., LUMBER-SOUTHWES
Decision Date | 11 April 2001 |
Docket Number | LUMBER-SOUTHWES,INC,No. 00-2827,00-2827 |
Citation | 255 F.3d 495 |
Parties | (8th Cir. 2001) SUTHERLANDAPPELLEE, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, APPELLANT. GENERAL AVIATION MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION; NATIONAL BUSINESS AVIATION ASSOCIATION, AMICI CURIAE. Submitted: |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
Appeal from the United States Tax Court
Before Wollman, Chief Judge, Murphy, Circuit Judge, and Goldberg,1 Judge.
In this case of first impression, we must determine the amount of expenses corporations may deduct on their income tax returns when they allow their officers to use corporate aircraft for personal vacations. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue ("Commissioner"), appellant in this action, disallowed the full amount of the deductions claimed by appellee Sutherland Lumber-Southwest, Inc. ("Sutherland") for expenses incurred in providing such flights. Sutherland filed a timely petition with the United States Tax Court challenging the disallowance. We affirm the Tax Court's ruling in favor of Sutherland.
Sutherland permitted its president and vice-president (the "officers") to use its corporate jet for a variety of purposes not related to Sutherland's business, including the officers' work for other businesses and charities, and for vacation travel. Because such flights constitute "fringe benefits" within the meaning of 26 U.S.C. § 61(a)(1) (1994), the officers reported them as compensation on their personal income tax returns. In assigning a value to these flights, Sutherland used the special valuation rule set forth in 26 C.F.R. § 1.61-21(g)(5) (2001). Under this formula, the value of a flight for purposes of the officers' reported compensation is based on the Standard Industry Fare Level ("SIFL") cents-per-mile rate, multiplied by a coefficient determined by the weight of the aircraft. The actual cost to the corporation of providing the flights is irrelevant to the calculation of SIFL rates.
In preparing its own tax returns for 1992 and 1993, Sutherland deducted all expenses related to the maintenance and operation of its corporate jet, including the costs incurred in providing the officers' vacation flights, pursuant to standard business accounting practices. See 26 U.S.C. § 162 (1994) ( ); 26 C.F.R. § 1.162-25T (2001) (). The Commissioner disallowed the full amount of Sutherland's deduction for the vacation flights, reasoning that they were a form of entertainment expense and thus subject to the rules regarding disallowance of such expenses. See 26 U.S.C. § 274 (1994 & Supp. IV 1998). Specifically, § 274(a)(1) provides:
No deduction otherwise allowable under this chapter shall be allowed for any item -
(A) Activity-With respect to an activity which is of a type generally considered to constitute entertainment, amusement, or recreation . . .
(B) Facility-With respect to a facility used in connection with an activity referred to in subparagraph (A).
26 U.S.C. § 274. However, § 274(e)(2) states that § 274(a) "shall not apply to [e]xpenses for goods, services, and facilities, to the extent that the expenses are treated by the taxpayer, with respect to the recipient of the entertainment, amusement, or recreation, as compensation to an employee on the taxpayer's return of tax . . . ." 26 U.S.C. § 274(e)(2) (emphasis added).
The Commissioner interprets the "to the extent that" language of § 274(e)(2) to work a limitation on the amount of allowable expenses, and argues that Sutherland's deduction is limited to the amount claimed as compensation by the officers, rather than to the actual cost of providing the vacation flights. Sutherland contests this interpretation of § 274, arguing that even if a corporate aircraft can be said to be an entertainment facility, the "to the extent that" clause effects a complete exception, removing from the application of § 274(a)(1) all eligible expenses that employers treat as compensation to their employees.
Confronted by this textual ambiguity, the Tax Court employed standard canons of construction. The court contrasted the unrestricted "to the extent that" language of § 274(e)(2) with other provisions in § 274 that employ similar language but expressly limit the available deduction. See, e.g. 26 U.S.C. § 274(b)(1) ( ). The Tax Court also observed that not only is subsection (e) captioned "[s]pecific exceptions to application of subsection (a)," but also...
To continue reading
Request your trial- Riddle v. Kemna
- Fraziear v. Rogerson
- Jihad v. Hvass
- Sain v. Campbell
-
The AJCA's domestic business provisions: the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (AJCA) is an expansive piece of legislation touching many types of taxpayers. This article discusses the AJCA provisions that primarily affect U.S. domestic businesses.
...332 (4th Cir. 1998), for examples of this rule's potential application. (6) Sutherland Lumber-Southwest, Inc., 114 TC 197 (2000), aff'd, 255 F3d 495 (8th Cir. 2001), acq., AOD 2002-02; for a discussion, see McGuire, Tax Clinic, "Company Planes: the AJCA Extends Bonus Depreciation, but Groun......
-
Personal use of corporate aircraft before and after the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004: The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 dramatically changed the rules with regard to deducting expenses associated with personal use of corporate aircraft by legislatively overruling the favorable Sutherland Lumber decision.
...discussion in the airplane industry because of the case of Sutherland Lumber-Southwest, Inc. v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. 197 (2000), aff'd, 255 F.3d 495 (8th Cir. 2001), acq., AOD 2002-02 (February 11, 2002). Due to the significance of this case under prior and current law, as amended by the ......
-
2004 American Jobs Creation Act: selected highlights.
...based on comparable treatment given to a C corporation in Sutherland Lumber-Southwest Inc. vs. Commissioner, 114 T.C. 197 (2000), aff'd 255 F.3d 495 (8 Cir. The new law overrules the Sutherland result by limiting an employer's or other service recipient's deduction for goods, services and f......
-
Maximizing the deduction for personal use of an aircraft.
...facilities related to such activities. Intended to overturn the decision in Sutherland Lumber-Southwest, Inc., 114 TC 197 (2000), aff'd, 255 F3d 495 (8th Cir. 2000), acq., AOD 2002-02, AJCA Section 907'S amendments to Sec. 274(e)(2) and (9) specifically disallow expenses related to entertai......