Suydam v. Thayer
Decision Date | 16 January 1888 |
Citation | 6 S.W. 502,94 Mo. 49 |
Parties | SUYDAM v. THAYER et al. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Testator, by one clause of his will, devised land to his son, providing that, if the son should die without issue, it should go to testator's brother for life, and afterwards to a specified charitable use. By a later clause testator provided that if the brother should die before the son, then, in case of the son's death without issue before he was of age, the land should go to the charitable use, and that these "reversions" should depend on his son's death before having issue capable of inheriting. At testator's death the son was about nine years old. Held, that by the first clause testator intended that the devise to the son should be defeated only in case of the son's death before attaining full age, and without such issue.
Error to circuit court, Jackson county; J. H. SLOVER, Judge.
Action by Joseph A. Suydam against William B. Thayer, Charles G. Hopkins, E. M. Steiger, Blake L. Woodson, prosecuting attorney for Jackson county, Missouri, the city of Kansas, and Jackson county, for the partition of certain land, to part of which plaintiff claimed title under conveyances from Sands W. Hopkins as devisee of William A. Hopkins under the will set out in the opinion, the construction of which is thus involved. Plaintiff's title was sustained below, and a decree in his favor was entered. Jackson county and the city of Kansas claimed an interest under the will by virtue of the remainder over for charitable uses, and sued out a writ of error.
B. L. Woodson, Pros. Atty., for plaintiff in error. Dobson, Douglass & Trimble and James F. Mister, for defendant in error. James F. Mister, for Charles G. Hopkins.
William A. Hopkins died in Jackson county on the twenty-fifth of August, 1867, leaving the following will, which was duly admitted to probate:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Kingston v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.
...183 Mo. 238, 81 S.W. 1162; RoBards v. Brown, 167 Mo. 447, 67 S.W. 245; Walton v. Drumtra, 152 Mo. 489, 54 S.W. 233; Suydam v. Thayer, 94 Mo. 49, 6 S.W. 502. (4) The will of Eliza McMillan imposed active duties upon the trustee of the trust therein established, requiring exercise of discreti......
-
Union Trust Company v. Curby
...is fully supported by the following authorities: Sullivan v. Garesche, 229 Mo. 496 (508); Rothwell v. Jamison, 147 Mo. 601 (615); Suydam v. Thayer, 94 Mo. 49; DeLassus Gatewood, 71 Mo. 371; Morrow v. Morrow, 113 Mo.App. 444; Richardson v. Noyes, 2 Mass. 56; Olney v. Hull, 21 Pick. 311; Schn......
-
State ex rel. Ashauer v. Hostetter
...(2) The Court of Appeals erred in failing to construe will in accord with intention of testator. Metz v. Wright, 116 Mo.App. 631; Suydam v. Thayer, 94 Mo. 49; O'Day O'Day, 193 Mo. 89; Ewart v. Dalby, 5 S.W.2d 436; Snow v. Ferril, 8 S.W.2d 1016. (3) The opinion of the St. Louis Court of Appe......
-
Small v. Field
...not from single words nor single passages, but from a consideration of the whole instrument and general design and scope of it." Suydam v. Thayer, 94 Mo. 55; Reinders v. Koppelman, 94 Mo. 343; Munroe Collins, 95 Mo. 37; Russell v. Eubanks, 84 Mo. 86; Allison v. Cheney, 63 Mo. 283. (6) And u......