Swenson v. Flint
| Decision Date | 10 January 1905 |
| Citation | 123 Wis. 613,101 N.W. 1135 |
| Parties | SWENSON v. FLINT ET AL. |
| Court | Wisconsin Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from Circuit Court, Dane County; E. Ray Stevens, Judge. Action by J. A. Swenson against A. S. Flint and others to foreclose mechanic's lien on building and property of defendant A. S. Flint; plaintiff claiming as a subcontractor under the defendant Harrison, and claiming personal judgment against him. Judgment was granted for personal recovery of the amount claimed against Harrison, and denying any lien as against Flint's property. From such denial of lien, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed by divided court.Tenneys, Hall & Swanson (Burr N. Jones, of counsel), for appellant.
Chas. N. Brown, Lamb, Richmond, Lamb & Jackson, and F. B. Wynne (Olin & Butler, of counsel), for respondents.
By reason of his previous relations with this case as circuit judge, Mr. Justice SIEBECKER is unable to participate in its consideration. The other justices being equally divided in opinion, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Smith v. Kleynerman
...Wis. 52, 96 N.W. 1135 (1903) (on appeal).5. Francisco v. Hatch , 124 Wis. 220, 101 N.W. 1135 (1905) (on appeal).6. Swenson v. Flint , 123 Wis. 613, 101 N.W. 1135 (1905) (on appeal).7. Montayne v. N. Electrical Mfg. Co. , 127 Wis. 22, 105 N.W. 1043 (1905) (on appeal).8. Stark v. Huber Mfg. C......
-
Hagenah v. Milwaukee Elec. Ry. & Light Co.
...established rule, necessitates affirmance of the judgment below. Jacobs v. Queen Ins. Co., 123 Wis. 608, 101 N. W. 1090;Swenson v. Flint, 123 Wis. 613, 101 N. W. 1135;Francisco v. Hatch, 124 Wis. 220, 101 N. W. 1135;Cook v. Minneapolis, St. P. & S. S. M. R. Co., 125 Wis. 528, 103 N. W. 1097......
-
Gruhl Sash & Door Co. v. Chi., M. & St. P. Ry. Co.
...opinion that the order should be affirmed. Under the establishedrule it follows that the order appealed from is affirmed. Swenson v. Flint, 123 Wis. 613, 101 N. W. 1135;Hagenah v. M. E. R. & L. Co., 136 Wis. 300, 116 N. W. 843;Estate of Carter, 167 Wis. 89, 166 N. W. 657. The order appealed......
-
Racine Auto Tire Co. v. Indus. Comm'n of Wis.
...that the judgment should be affirmed. Under the established rule, it follows that the judgment appealed from is affirmed. Swenson v. Flint, 123 Wis. 613, 101 N. W. 1135;Hagenah v. M. E. R. & L. Co., 136 Wis. 300, 116 N. W. 843;Estate of Carter, 167 Wis. 89, 166 N. W. 657. The judgment appea......