Swigert v. Parker

Decision Date25 April 1950
Citation46 So.2d 16
PartiesSWIGERT v. PARKER.
CourtFlorida Supreme Court

J. A. Fitzsimmons, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Maurer, Maurer & Maurer, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

TERRELL, Justice.

In 1918 Lot 22, Block 1, Pinehurst, Broward County was conveyed to appellant by warranty deed. In December 1943, appellee acquired title to the same land by tax deed and subsequently instituted this suit to quiet her title. There was an answer to the bill of complaint, and on final hearing, a decree was entered for the plaintiff. The defendant appealed.

The crucial point in the case is whether or not mailing copy of the published notice of application for tax deed to the owner or to the party last paying taxes on the land or the execution of an affidavit reciting the reasons for failure to do so as required by Chapter 22079, Acts of 1943, amending Chapter 20722, Acts of 1941, F.S.A. § 192.21 seq., is mandatory and jurisdictional.

In Heinberg v. Andress, Fla., 45 So.2d 488, we were confronted with the identical question and by unanimous opinion we gave it an affirmative answer, so the case at bar is reversed on authority of Heinberg v. Andress, last cited.

Reversed.

ADAMS, C. J., and CHAPMAN, THOMAS, SEBRING, HOBSON and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Wells v. Thomas
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • January 5, 1954
    ...its amendment in 1943 by Chapter 22079, Laws of Florida, Acts of 1943. And this decision was followed in the later cases of Swigert v. Parker, Fla., 46 So.2d 16, 17; Thacker v. Biggers, Fla., 48 So.2d 750; and Montgomery v. Gipson, Fla., 69 So.2d But in none of these cases did we consider t......
  • Locke v. Stuart
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 11, 1959
    ...issue of fact for determination by a jury. See Wells v. Thomas, Fla., 78 So.2d 378; Montgomery v. Gipson, Fla., 69 So.2d 305; Swigert v. Parker, Fla., 46 So.2d 16; Heinberg v. Andress, Fla., 45 So.2d 488, and Ozark Corp. v. Pattishall, 135 Fla. 610, 185 So. 333. The question remains, of wha......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT