Sykes v. Lincoln County School Dist. No. 1 & 2
Decision Date | 07 November 1988 |
Docket Number | No. 1,No. 4,No. 88-78,No. 6,A,1,4,6,88-78 |
Citation | 763 P.2d 1263 |
Parties | 50 Ed. Law Rep. 198 John Thomas SYKES, a minor; John E. Sykes and Vivian Sykes, individually and as next friends and guardians of John Thomas Sykes, Appellants (Plaintiffs), v. LINCOLN COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1 & 2; Teton School District; Sublette County School District; Sweetwater County School District & 2; Uinta County School District; Uinta County School District; Uinta County School Districtppellees (Defendants). |
Court | Wyoming Supreme Court |
Roy A. Jacobson, Jr. and Sharon M. Rose of Vehar, Beppler, Jacobson, Lavery & Rose, P.C., Kemmerer, for appellants.
Kathryn A. Jenkins of Kline, Buck & Asay, Cheyenne, for appellee Lincoln County School Dist. No. 1.
Paul B. Godfrey and Raymond W. Martin of Godfrey, Sundahl & Jorgenson, Cheyenne, for appellees Lincoln County School Dist. No. 2, Teton School Dist. No. 1, Sweetwater County School Dist. Nos. 1 & 2, Uinta County School Dist. Nos. 1, 4 and 6.
Carol Gonnella, Jackson, for amicus curiae, Region V Bd. of Co-op. Educational Services.
Nelson L. Hayes and Michael P. Zaccheo of Richards, Brandt, Miller & Nelson, Salt Lake City, Utah, for amicus curiae, Boces.
Before CARDINE, C.J., THOMAS and MACY, JJ., ROONEY, Ret. J., and LEHMAN, District Judge.
Appellants appeal from the denial of their motion for a partial summary judgment against appellees School Districts on the issue of the existence of vicarious liability on the part of such appellees, and from the grant of such appellees' motion for summary judgment on the same issue. 1 The motions acknowledged the non-existence of a genuine issue of material fact relative to such issue.
We affirm.
Appellant John Thomas Sykes is a minor child who suffers from physical and mental handicaps. He and his family reside within the boundaries of appellee Uinta County School District No. 4. Such School District entered into a special education residential services agreement with Region V Board of Cooperative Educational Services (hereinafter referred to as "BOCES"), wherein BOCES agreed to provide for the education of appellant John Thomas Sykes and to render related services, including room and board. 2 Pursuant to such agreement, he was placed at the C Bar V Ranch facility owned and operated by BOCES. On November 2, 1985, a staff member of BOCES was bathing appellant John Thomas Sykes when the staff member was called to the telephone. Either appellant John Thomas Sykes or another student turned on the hot water in the bathtub, and appellant John Thomas Sykes was severely burned.
The act authorizes the establishment of a board of cooperative services by an agreement between the boards of trustees of two or more school districts. The members of the boards of trustees of the participating school districts elect, from among their members, the members of the board of cooperative educational services, with each board of trustees being entitled to at least one member on the board of cooperative educational services.
In its orders denying appellants' motion for partial summary judgment and granting appellees' motions for summary judgment, the district court recited in part:
For the purposes of this appeal, it is immaterial whether or not BOCES is a partnership, a joint venture or a cooperative association of school districts as argued by appellants. The important determination is whether or not BOCES is a "governmental entity," as found by the district court. This, because the waiver of immunity for torts contained in the Wyoming Governmental Claims Act, W.S. 1-39-101, et seq., applies to "[a] governmental entity and its public employees while acting within the scope of duties * * *." W.S. 1-39-104 (emphasis added). The term is defined in W.S. 1-39-103:
School districts are there specifically designated. The "agencies, instrumentalities and institutions" of school districts are stated to be "governmental entities" for the purpose of the act. BOCES is both an agency of appellees School Districts and an instrumentality of them. Therefore, BOCES is a "governmental entity" for the purposes of the act.
BOCES acts, and agrees to act, on behalf of the appellees School Districts in furnishing educational services to handicapped children of the districts. BOCES is subject to ultimate control of appellees School Districts inasmuch as the membership of its board of cooperative services consists of school board members from appellees School Districts.
"Agency is the fiduciary relation which results from the manifestation of consent by one person to another that the other shall act on his behalf and subject to his control, and consent by the other so to act."
Restatement of Agency 2d, § 1(1) at 7 (1958). Accordingly, BOCES is an agency of appellees School Districts.
BOCES serves the appellees School Districts as a means to an end, i.e., to...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Natrona County School Dist. No. 1 v. McKnight
...recognized in limitations of placement in some states and by development of multi-district institutions. See Sykes v. Lincoln County School District No. 1, 763 P.2d 1263 (Wyo.1988).13 It is difficult to establish of what the actual record as presented for review may consist. There is a plea......
-
Fowler v. Westair Enterprises, Inc.
...so to act." True, 577 P.2d at 999 (quoting 1 RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF AGENCY § 1 at 7 (1957)). See also Sykes v. Lincoln County School District No. 1 & 2, 763 P.2d 1263, 1266 (Wyo.1988). Whether an agency relationship exists is a question of fact; however, when the evidence does not create a......